A member of the Saudi religious police has been accused of having six wives at the same time - two more than allowed under religious laws, reports say.
Saudi accused of having six wives

The 56-year-old was detained in south-western Jizan province…
The accused denies the women are all currently his wives and says he has divorced two of them.

Mus-lim men can keep up to four wives at a time under sh-aria, or Is-lamic law, which is applied in Sa-udi Arabia.

When Four just isn’t enough…

I mean how else can they pander to insatiable, perverse Muzlim lust, populate the face of the earth, and um.. colonize the world for All-ah, huh?

Must be all bout the “cultural issues” again right?

We Westerners, just don’t understand that some murder their own sisters and daughters over clothing.
Murder Charge for Brother Whose Sister Shed Scarf

The brother of a Canadian teenager who was slain in what friends described as a family dispute over a Muslim head scarf was charged with murder, becoming the second family member accused in her death, police said Friday.
Their father Muh-ammad Par-vez, 57, was charged with first-degree murder earlier this month. He had been a suspect since shortly after her death.

We close minded Westerners simply refuse to think of our daughters or wives as property.

…who can be summarily tossed in the garbage heap if they refuse to comply with the wishes of the “man of da house” or those charming Saudi cultural dictates.

Marrying six girls or women? Divorcing them at will?

No problemo for Izlamopathics.

If you do not respect women, you will respect nothing.

Don’t hold your breath for any “human rights” leftists or Hollyweirdos either. They conveniently turn a blind eye to this alleged… “culture” of emotionally-backward misogynists when they are not venerating it and soaking in its victimhood.

The Soros socialist leftards are way too busy spending their time propagating how evil America, our Military and George Bush are, remember?

For once let us be honest my friends.

There simply exists no common ground between Izlam and the West, Izlam and America, or Izlam and Israel.

Our entire culture is based upon the recognition and preservation of fundamental God-given human rights.

Theirs um………isn’t.

I can tell ya one thing.
This aint goin to end pretty.

I’m thinkin messy, epic Battle.

Honoring women with y’all and my friends over at Perri Nelson’s Website, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Mark My Words, 123beta, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, Shadowscope, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Nuke’s, third world county, DragonLady’s World, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, , and Dumb Ox Daily News, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

“We wanted to revamp the headscarf,”explains Domenico Dolce, “give it a new life and introduce it to a younger generation. Our aim was to give it a modern and cool twist.”
Scarves are making headlines once again

According to Dennis Nothdruft, curator of London’s Fashion and Textile Museum, this headscarf resurgence is about a new sense of chastity in fashion.

“Before peasants used them to keep their heads cool, women wore headscarves in medieval times to maintain their modesty,” he explains.

Given that the fashion world likes nothing better than provocation, isn’t it also a nod to Islam? “There’s no doubt that we have a huge Muslim clientèle,” agrees Alexander. “But this is more about a return to that elegant Grace Kelly era than anything else.”

So, will this strange amalgam of royal homeliness, Muslim chic and proletarian pretence ever take off? Come autumn, will we be seeing women ambling down high streets or queueing at the cold meat counter in Waitrose, looking like Russian peasants.

Terrorist chic all over again.

“A new sense of chastity in fashion”?..Ha. Are they kidding?
Chastity and modern fashions are mutually exclusive.

Try puttin a burka on them eh.

Designers and women who don their monstrosities wouldn’t know modesty or chastity if it hid them smack on their bared cl-eavages or exposed midriffs.

And about that “huge Muslim clientèle”?..Aw..just a coincidence right?

Certainly we get NO historical context whatsoever regarding the adorable new headscarf either. Priceless.
It’s not enough that Muzlim women get their throats slit by their own fathers for not donning the “veil”, but the compulsion has even spread to NON Muzlim women:

NON-Muslim English girls will be ordered to wear headscarves at a new Islamic school.
Madani High School in Leicester will take ten per cent of its pupils from other faiths ? but insists all must cover their heads.

Headteachers ruled the hijab scarf is part of the uniform.
Non-Muslims ‘must wear hijab’
Assistant principal Zainab Elgaziari said the demand was not a problem despite the row over Muslim women’s veils.

He said: “I can’t see why if a student wears a headscarf it should be an issue. It’s the same as a shirt or tie ? it’s just part of our uniform.”

There are literally thousands of examples.

Pick a Muzlim country. Any country.
C’mon. Do it.

Do women have a choice? ha. Nice joke.
Just posing the question belies the ignorance of the masses regarding compulsion in Izlam.

Fashion Designers thrive on to pushing the boundaries of social sensibilities.

But not apparently when it comes to the “styles” of Izlam.

After all …So what if Muham-MAD fought unprovoked battles, raided merchant caravans, beheaded thousands of innocent people, married multiple women…um….. including a nine-year old girl. Oh, did I mention that he was 54 years old at the time?

Oh, and while wer’e at it………Let’s not forget flat out murder of women shall we.

Check out the lovely lil Kooranic verse (4:34):

Men are the maintainers of women because All—ah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as All—ah has guarded; and as to those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely All–ah is High, Great.

Uh huh.

Dontcha jus love the fashion worlds’ touch of legitimizing Izzlamic male violence against women by makin the “headscarf” all trendy and chic?

Oh lookie here. It comes in all colors.

Out of all the possible hat comebacks….

Not exactly this, now is it?

Of course, muzlim men (if you can call them that)..must preserve the morals and principles of Izlam…poor things. Must be a full time job keepin those girlz in line.

We all know how much female “honor” is prized and female sex-ual purity exalted (even if they do cut out womens’ genit-als.)

Why an entire family can be cast out if a female member brings shame upon it. And needless to say - the only way to restore peace is through violence. Men beating and killing their own wives and daughters.

What do these fashionistas think..that the headscarf and forced modesty happens in some sort of social vacuum?

Muzlims are acculturated to the belief that women who break taboos deserve to be beaten, even killed. Of course this all for the common good.

And yes………it’s all voluntary. Rrrright.

The controversial local laws inspired by sharia are now being applied to non-Muslim citizens. Female students who do not wear the headscarf are suspended, and few have the courage to rebel, because of fear of reprisals from fundamentalists.
In Padang, Islamic law is now imposed on all
Among the other norms inspired by sharia, they recall the obligation for students in the elementary schools to learn the Qur’an by heart.

So just how many girls and women are living in constant fear of the men in their households– enduring silent, anonymous suffering with their trendy new lil headscarf eh?

Chic indeed.

Open Trackbacks all weekend!

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

Marc Jacobs, Salvatore Ferragamo, Givenchy and Alexander McQueen may to get their bi-focals adjusted.

Apparently, they can’t tell the genders apart anymore.

Andro: meaning male. Gyn: meaning female. Which is which?

Make no mistake. We are not addressing those born with both male and female gen-itals. We are calling out those that state there is such a thing as psychological androgyny.
How cool to combine both masculinity and femininity as traits of some unified, mutated gender eh?

When women began to flood the workforce, “borrowin from da boys” was routine.

Manly power suits were all the rage.

Clothes were meant to project a somewhat austere and certainly- professional image.

No frills or flowing hair. Dress shirts, blazers, and even wide-legged pants became the norm. Some women even pulled back their hair back in a bun, and saved the matching scarves and bags for nighttime.

But alas……… “handsome girls” weren’t enough.

Not only did women discard the professional look for bearing cl-eavage at work, donning str-ipper stilletoes and baring midriffs— Men have to now be “pretty boys”.

Androgyny in fashion is no mere “trend” my friends. It is a profound social phenomenon.

Remember Boy George, David Bowie, and Prince? The epitome of sexual ambiguity. Howzabout Michael Jackson who personifies androgyny with his high pitched, falsetto voice and effeminate ways.

Needless to say, the lefties and Hollyweird bozos insist their female stars perform equally well in all the exciting moves and dangerous stunts as their male counterparts…provided they dress scantily and sluttify themselves while they’re punchin out the mean guys, of course.

The underlying and not so subtle aim is to blur and haze the line between men and womens’wear, thus blurring the line between men and women period.

After all, the kool aid drinkers will tell ya there are no distinct masculine or feminine traits or attributes to begin with, right?

Prancin around half nekked is “empowering” for women?

That’s called elevating women’s status in male-oriented societies? Ha.
Softening the image of men? How has that helped the relations between men and women?

Here’s the charming result:

-Lower childbirth rates because “working” women tend to delay marriage, (if they marry at all) or wayyy past their prime for childbearing.

-A higher divorce rate due to so many factors. Marriages literally collapsing because both “working” parents can’t be bothered to spend enough time together or with their children.

-An astronomical increase of unmarried people as more and singles enjoy their financial independence and supposed “freedom.” Uh huh.

“Family unit erosion” for the Libs? No problemo. Who needs a traditional family unit when you got the gummint right?

But, while they feverishly attempt to alter the perception of human nature, some of us know that God in His infinite wisdom, created human nature as consisting of opposite sex roles which ultimately unify- as two complimentary roles in the sanctity of marriage.

It’s all part of their spiffy lil global plan for our Universe.
Borders should disappear, Cultures (irrespective of their “lack of culture”) should blend, blend, blend..and markets all over the world should merge, merge, merge.

Inna meantime…The gay ahem..”liberation” movement pounced on the idea of androgyny. Sure, it gives les-bians and ho-mose-xual men a once in a life time opportunity to display their so-called “gender characteristics” openly in society. No political agenda eh?

We are all one.

Despots? Jeehadis? Illegal, criminal immigrants?
Join the luvfest.

Wearing lace and ribbons and sharing with y’all and my friends over at The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson’s Website, Right Truth, Shadowscope, DragonLady’s World, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog’s Weblog, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, nuke gingrich, Faultline USA, third world county, The World According to Carl, , Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Wolf Pangloss, , and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

In the battle of the sexes, women’s magazine editor Cynthia Good said this was a skirmish she had to fight.

‘Men At Work’ signs to disappear in Atlanta
Decision follows complaints by magazine editor.
Across Atlanta they stood, orange signs with black letters that read “Men At Work” or “Men Working Ahead.”
Sometimes, the signs stood next to women working alongside the men.

Good demanded Atlanta officials remove the signs and last week, Atlanta Public Works Commissioner Joe Basista agreed.
Score one for gender equality, Good said Wednesday.

I wonder if these “feminists” have any prob with these signs:

Lesse now.

Men working. Signs.

Rape and forced marriages of one year olds in Muzlimville isn’t a “skirmish” any American feminists feel compelled to “fight” eh?
Female genital mutilation doesn’t even warrant a peep.

Bet the feminist “Change the signs” brigade never even heard of Ghada Jamshir.

Please watch:

Do ya ever hear so much as an utterance from feminists about Shaaaaaria law, where women’s rights do not even exist?

How bout outrage toward Arabic countries where there exist no women’s support groups, no shelters for women trying to leave abusive husbands or other family members, namely their own fathers, brothers or male cousins.

Muzlim women get 3 things: orders, unending suffering, and death.

Rrrright. Try takin it off dollface.

What they have the unmitigated Izlamic gall to call “honor killings” are part and parcel of Izlam. You will find them in every single Muzlim society on the globe.

And guess what, now that we and Europe have welcomed this death cult onto our shores -they are even happening right here in these United States of America.

Any feminist murmur bout this yet?

Oh. And how bout those “muuut’ah” marriages..ya know those convenient lil temporary marriages, which are nothing more than a thinly-disguised system of prostitution eh?

Se-xual enslavement and perversions presented in the Koooran and the haaadiths are among the best kept secrets about Izlam. Only we’re on to you.

Indeed. “Western” women are too busy raging about being able to do construction work like one of da boys, be fire”men”, and be just as strong as their fellow police”men” in their struggle to be accepted as “equal” partners.

I don’t know bout y’all, but if my loved one was trapped in a burning building, I’d want a MAN trying to hoist him down.

If I dial 911 because there’s a 6 foot perp mugging an old lady on the street, I’d want a MAN trying to subdue him.

As far as construction women bein all brawny, gettin all dirty and “working alongside the men”…….
Yea. Good on you for changin the signs.

Now how bout y’all go out there and REALLY help the cause of women huh.
Heck, I’ll even give you your very own sign.

Open Trackbacks all weekend!

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

A backlash has begun against the all-must-have-prizes culture that has produced children used to getting their own way..
Our little emperors: does worrying do more harm than good?

As the mother of two young daughters,… is used to doling out praise for almost everything they do. Even she was taken aback, however, when her younger daughter, Rachel, now 5, arrived home from nursery clutching a certificate for “sitting nicely on the carpet”.

“It made me wonder what she was doing the rest of the time,” …. “I thought it was a bit over the top rewarding her for something so routine. But it’s part of a whole culture of stickers and smiley faces and ‘celebration assemblies’.”

The received wisdom on child-rearing says nothing should be allowed to damage a child’s sense of self-worth: just last week the Football Association (FA) decided to ban teams including children under eight from publishing their results, for fear of putting the kids under too much pressure if they lost a match.
It is becoming a worldwide trend. A recent production of Snow White at a primary school in Japan featured 25 Snow Whites, no dwarfs and no wicked witch, as parents objected to one child being picked out for the title role. In Sweden a boy was prevented from handing out invitations to his birthday party at school because he was “discriminating” against the two classmates he did not invite.

“Too many kids … are growing up without boundaries, without discipline and without the family structures they need,” he said. “We should bring back discipline and the idea of punishment.”

FYI. This amazing country of ours was built on strength and honor, not touchy feely dimwits who allow everyone to “win”, while eliminating all healthy competition and discipline.

The joy of witnessing these little 4 and 5 year old “rock stars” with their parents fawning over their every move..Uh huh… Asking children what they want for dinner, what they choose to wear, how they “feel” every 15 seconds.

Guess what folks?
Everyone is NOT always a winner.

Common sense, responsibilty for oneself, respect for authority and decency have all been deep sixed in favor of “feeling good alla time.”

These touchy feely kids grow up not giving a fig for anyone but their sorry, self centered selves.
As adults, they remain coddled and over-indulged just as much as children.

Our Pop Idol culture offers “prizes” for every job well done.
What does our culture value? Pushiness, self-centeredness and attention-seeking behaviors seem to be prized far above talent and discipline for men. Looks, thinness, and sexualizing themselves is what is prized for women.

Giving kids a medal for helping tidy his desk or everytime he manages to “sit still”?

How many more rewards, stickers, smiley faces,and dang star charts do these children have to get before they realize this behavior should be expected, not rewarded?

Howzabout we teach our kids to be independent, allow them to fail and actually learn from it. Hmmmm.

To be polite and courteous , yes, and oooh… even competitive!
They will run circles around the little snowflakes who run to mommy (and eventually to government), to complain about every challenge life throws at them.

Between you and me, a huge part of this fiasco has been generated (out of guilt),by women who work long hours outside of the home, spend little time with their children, and have “nannies” do what “mommy” ideally should be doing.
But despite their absentee mothering…………
Their children must be seen by all as a pinnacle of their achievements in life.

You can choose to be your child’s friend, or your child’s parent.

Being buddies may is easier, but only the latter is really raising a child.
The “friendship” part kicks in…when they are much older…and IF, you actually raised them.

Open Trackbacks guys and dolls.

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

American Greetings will soon introduce new and improved Care Bears with “less belly fat, longer eyelashes.” But that’s not all! This change comes as part of a larger movement to update the animated friends of our youth.

Strawberry Shortcake, Care Bears to Receive Makeovers; Childhood Spoiled

Other “improvements” you can look forward to (or not): The company’s new Strawberry Shortcake is way skinnier (thanks to a more “fruit-forward” diet), and she has replaced her calico cat with a cell phone.

The scoffers minimize and ridicule those of us who mourn the Loss of innocence and all its moral implications………..

No more modest outfit or childlike appearance for you Strawberry Shortcake. No no no.

Why not go all the way and put all little childrens’ dolls in halter tops and short shorts while wer’e at it eh?

She musn’t have freckles, or be pudgy. Uh uh. Her figure must be svelte and her skin- silky smooth.
Tighter clothes, longer hair, and of course……….. a smaller nose.
Every single female, no matter how young or what she represents– must be sexualized.

Sure, it’s time to pretty up Strawberry Shortcake with that wide-eyed vacant look that all Disney heroines have.

Se-xing up women isn’t enough. No siree shortcake. We must s-ex up our babies and little girls as well.
Ever look at at a Bratz doll?..with their huge heads, long eyelashes, long flowing hair and
po-rno outfits? Who exactly is playing with her?

And since when did Strawberry Shortcake suddenly morph into a 10 year old? She looked about 3 or so, but 10 has soooooooo much more “perv potential” doesn’t it?

Replacing her pet cat with a cell phone? Now, that’s pricless.

After all what good is a purely innocent “childlike” figure anyway?

So, where’s her bare midriff shirt and belly ring?..Or do those accessories cost extra?

Mourning the loss of innocence with Outside the Beltway, The Virtuous Republic, Rosemary’s Thoughts, 123beta, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, DragonLady’s World, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, third world county, Nuke Gingrich, McCain Blogs, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, , and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Today’s Doozies:
Lines that ought to be jokes..but are dead serious.

Angel’s first prize goes to:
Virginia Commonwealth University fashion students.

Here’s his little “gem”:
“Hopefully, if nothing else, those 20 people in my class have gained a more neutral approach to what goes on in the world,” Guthrie said. “Just because the women wear this doesn’t mean they’re oppressed.”

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The assignment for Virginia Commonwealth University fashion students: design an abaya, an enveloping cloak worn by Muslim women, that is stylish yet acceptable in Arab countries.

The results: elaborately beaded designs, a flamenco-influenced abaya, a punk rock abaya — and perhaps a better understanding of cultural norms in the Persian Gulf nation of Qatar, where the university has had a campus for 10 years.

Fashion students at Va. university design abayas

However, in Saudi Arabia, which follows strict Islamic codes, officials warn that women should not wear unapproved abayas — including those with ornamentation.

“Just because the women wear this doesn’t mean they’re oppressed.” ?..Ha.

Just like any other Fashion Show eh?

Talk bout context huh.

Maybe they got the idea from Michael Jackson.
Here he is hiding from the Press wearing his.

Muzlim Misogyny is celebrated my dears.
That’s right. Celebrated.

Where to start?

-Legitimized beatings, abuse and “HONOR” killings:

Qur–an 4:34, the Mus-lim holy book’s notorious verse commanding the beating of disobedient women..
There Must Be Violence Against Women

Raped, tortured and slaughtered by their father.

Fathers are responsible for their daughters’ behavior, but human rights organizations deny this too. Brothers also should take action regarding their sisters’ behavior, especially if their parents are too old or dead. If a daughter or sister makes a mistake – especially a moral one – that negatively affects the entire family and its reputation.

-Genital Mutilation:

The “instruments”: Note the absence of anesthesia.

KABUL, Afghanistan - When asked about her engagement party this summer, little Su-nam glanced blankly at her family, then fiddled with her gold-sequined engagement outfit _ a speechless response not out of shyness, but because she does not yet talk much. Su-nam is 3.

Read it and Weep

-Forced Marriages for Women and Children:

It’s a well-kept secret in Pakistani homes across the city: Young women violently forced to return to their homeland for arranged marriages.
Parents force daughters to fly home to Pakistan for arranged marriages

“Eighty percent of the community has this problem” in New York, said Bazah Roohi of the Asian American Network Against Abuse of Human Rights (ANAA). “Women don’t have their own choice.

“They try to fight. They are unsuccessful. Parents are very strict. They just beat them and take them to Pakistan.

In Pakistan, it would not have been a crime if her father pulled the trigger, but an “honor killing.”

No compulsion? Ha.
Yea. Try takin it off. Better yet, try to convert.

You won’t need it anymore cuz you won’t have a head left to cover.

Izlam is a fundamentalistic, fascistic, totalitarian, and expansionistic ideology.
Ther’s nothing warm and fuzzy about it.

It it unashamedly averse and hostile to modernity, democracy, and freedom and rights for women. Read the Ko–ran. Better yet : Watch “Fitna”… before you call that generalizing.
In Izlamic societies, laws and punishments are based on controlling women.

Segregation, restrictions on travel, and coercing them to conform to the restrictive dress code. Not offering the “option.”

A girl taking off a headscarf is a challenge to their whole theocratic. thugish, terrorist State.

Note the torture, and subsequent slaughter of young girls throughout the Muzlim world: DAILY.
Girl, 17, killed in Iraq for loving a British soldier

A 17-year-old Iraqi girl was murdered by her father in an honour killing after falling in love with a British soldier she met while working on an aid programme in Basra, it has been claimed.

Women in Izlam are ascribed no Human Rights…You know those rights that are based on natural rights, which any adult human being capable of choice should have.

There is no separation of state and religion in Izlam; - hence any criticism of one is clearly seen as a criticism of the other.

Justification from the Ko–ran:

4.34. Men are in charge of women, because All-ah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which All-ah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart; and scourge (beat) them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them Lo! Al-lah is ever High Exalted, Great.

The Plight of Women UNDER Izlam:

Rules that keep women in their Muh-am-mad stipulated place:

* If a Mu-slim woman is murdered, her beneficiary is entitled to one-half dyyeh-blood money, or compensation-as that of a murdered Mu-slim male.

* A woman’s testimony in the court of law is worth one-half that of a man.

* A woman must provide four witnesses to substantiate her claim of being raped.

* A man can divorce his wife by simply saying to her, “I divorce you,” three times.

* A divorced woman is entitled to a miserly compensation and automatically forfeits her rights to her children.

* Women are barred from the lucrative and powerful cast of clergy.

* Husbands are entitled to punish their wives corporally.

* Men are allowed to have four wives at any one time and as many concubines as they desire and can afford.

* Sau-di Ar-abia, the custodian of “true Is-lam” imposes a raft of restrictions on women such as: women are not allowed to drive; they are not permitted to leave the country without accompaniment or explicit permission of their male kin; they are barred from most government jobs and much much more.

* Among other Mus-lims, such as the Ta-liban and the Pas-htoon of Afghanistan-Pakistan region, women are barred from education and not even allowed to leave the house unless accompanied by a male kin.

* Since education, particularly professional education is often denied to women in many Is-lamic societies. There is scarcity of women physicians and male doctors are often forbidden to treat women patients.
Islam’s Apartheid

But G’head Virginia Commonwealth University fashion students….celebrate the “cloak” why don’t ya.

But whatever ya do……..Don’t peek under that veil.
No doubt, you will find a veil of blood, rage, scars and tears.

Sharing fashion sense ..heh with y’all and linking to Rosemary’s Thoughts, McCain Blogs, DragonLady’s World, Right Truth, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, , Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, and The Yankee Sailor, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

If you’ve been to a grocery store lately, you no doubt have noticed the tabloids featuring photos of what appears to be a thirty-something man, with beard, with under-arm hair and, quite conspicuously, with child.

Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender–Whatever
There’s just one problem: Beattie is not a man. She is a woman. Beattie legally became a “man” a decade ago. But at the most basic anatomical and chromosomal levels, Beattie is still a woman.

Interestingly, the mainstream media’s near unanimous use of the pronouns “he,” “his” and “him” when referring to Beattie reveal how far the transgender movement has come in normalizing what the American Psychological Association still conditionally calls a “mental disorder.”

Rights for the transgendered has become the Left’s latest cause celebre. And, as with most of the Left’s cultural crusades, considerable effort is being exerted to capture the hearts and minds of children. News reports suggest there are an increasing number of young children interested in “re-assigning” their gender.

Last year, the California legislature passed a law that redefines gender for the purposes of public school instruction to teach California children that “gender means sex and includes a person’s gender identity and gender related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with a person’s assigned sex at birth.” In short, it means kids in California can choose their own sex.

Medicaid will even pay for a sex change operation, if it is deemed “medically necessary.”
An inmate convicted of murder in Wisconsin is suing for a state-financed sex-change operation. He claims the state’s refusal to pay for the surgery constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment.”

We who oppose same-sex “marriage” have argued that it would lead to the legalization of other forms of “marriage,” including polygamy, and, eventually, to the dissolution of the institution altogether.

“If marriage can mean anything,” we argue, “then it will end up meaning nothing.”

Is society ready for this pregnant husband?

“A man’s item shall not be on a woman, and a man shall not wear a woman’s garment; whoever does such a thing is an abhorrence unto God.”
Deuteronomy 22:5

So……Why does the Bible insist men and women not dress in each others styles or clothing? Is it just a fashion statement?

Clearly, the Biblical concern here, is, firstly with creating and reinforcing gender differences, and secondly in preventing gender associations of clothing in being used to deceive others for purposes of se-xual immorality.

In recent decades American (and thus most of the modern worlds’ ) societies have embraced the fashion trends toward a larger body of “unisex” apparel.

Women can be seen wearing suits and ties. Pants and particularly, blue jeans are now common to both genders.
Men are being radically feminized.
Just as in pagan religions in the past, men tried to emulate the preeminent mother-goddess figures by being more effeminate and often dressing as women, so too, men now are told to preen, wax, and worship their vanity.

According to Judeo-Christian teachings, there are only two gender presentations and like it or not, they are inseparably tied to the genetic sex into which we are born.

We enter into this world as either “little girls” or “little boys” and yes, to some extent are expected to live our lives in accordance to the defined gender roles that our religion and society have assigned” to each sex, provided they are not contrary to our moral beliefs or unfairly biased against us.

The Bible, likewise believes in inate “feminine” or “masculine” qualities and roles, enumerating this on several occasions.

Men and women are not interchangeable.

We are bestowed with the psychological and spiritual potential to develop as uniquely feminine or masculine, despite having both feminine and masculine traits within us.

Feminine and masculine traits are compliments, They are two parts of one complete whole.
That is the purpose of a religious marriage. To unite these complimentary forces in the Love and worship of God, and to join in creating new life.

It becomes overwhelming for children born into a culture where the language, social and behavioral mores, the media: movies, books, and television programs are full of gender confusion.

Men and women resent their roles. Children are indocrinated with images of men and women, parents, couples who ultimately become hostile toward each other and are unable to relate to one another respectfully.

The Liberal agenda denies the existence of “normalcy” beyond a societal consensus.
In other words, who’s to say what’s “normal” huh?

What’s next?..Bes-tiality?

Whether it’s the insistence of hom-osexuality or trans-genderism as “normal”, ultimately this artificial role will not be consistent with one’s anatomical sex, or psychological makeup.
Despite the media hype and leftist propaganda, those lifestyles will never be truly in harmony with ones spiritual growth or truth.

Tran-sgenderism is a disorder period.

A broken arm or leg is too. But if it were up to lefty liberals, they may suggest new age, “alternative” treatments for broken arms or legs, you know..perhaps some counseling, cosmetic treatments, or heck, just requiring everybody else in society to treat the person with the broken limb with more sensitivity and compassion eh?

Of course, the language used by Libs to describe hom-osexuality or tran-sgenderism always supports determinism.

No. You were not “born that way.”
And they can’t prove that one iota.

There is not a shred of evidence for a biological basis for any of these disorders in terms of measurable differences in genetic makeup, brain microstructure or physiology.

There is no basis whatsoever for “special civil rights” to be granted to hom-osexuals or tran-sgenders.

The key words Libs omit are : Social environment and Personal choice.

Ah yes……..Personal choice.
Y’all do remember that, don’t ya Libs?

Count on the Leftys to obfuscate this issue by saying..but but but.. “they are happy”, so who are “we to judge”?………….. as if that’s the litmus for spiritual or mental health.

Sharing gender clarity with my friends over at Stop the ACLU, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Right Truth, Maggie’s Notebook, Adam’s Blog, DragonLady’s World, Cao’s Blog, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Cat, D equals S, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Nuke Gingrich, McCain Blogs, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Pirate’s Cove, Beagle Scout, A Newt One, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, researchers have actually observed the effects of love on the brain.
When people in the early stages of infatuation are shown photos of their sweethearts and told to think about them, areas of the brain rich in the chemical dopamine are activated. Dopamine produces very powerful pleasurable sensations.

Cocaine and amphetamine, for example, produce their effects by spurring the release of dopamine.

As relationships mature, however, those areas are less responsive to the mere sight of one’s lover. To be successful, the relationship must evolve from dopamine-driven euphoria to a more mindful cultivation of love and respect.
How Marriage Helps Your Brain
Flowers and candlelight dinners help, but so do exploring and experiencing the world together. In fact, one area of the brain that “lights up” in these later stages of love is the cortex, the same place where information is stored and rational decisions are made.

Ah yes. Passionate love. How exciting.How electrifying!

But if there’s one sure thing about it…it’s this : It doesn’t last.

Daily stressors, arguments over money, raising kids, or the most trivial of things can deflate that passion and romantic love in a hearbeat.

The happiest folk are the ones who despite disappointing each other at times…still insist on showing kindness, acceptance, compassion, and love to their partners…which, ironically, oftentimes - leads to more of those very same qualities from their partner.

Let’s be honest.
Everyone messes up…ok..some more than others. Heh.

But hanging on to grudges or betrayals for dear life , make you perpetuate the damage, sometimes endlessly.
T’aint easy but sometimes, if you can’t seem to let go of your pain, bitterness or hurt, a counselor or close friend can help you learn ways to forgive and to finally just let it go.

Nothing can rekindle your love faster than just having fun together.
What’s fun you ask?..Pfftt.
C’mon..You remember fun..dontya?

-Take long walks.
-Learn something new together.
-Laugh. ok..that was corny...but what’s better medicine than laughter…you tell me.

-Or…just do Nothing- together.

-Compliment…………..alot. Heh. (That’s for you boys)

-Use pet names…be generous with hugs and kisses.

-Listen. Just……….listen.

-Take vacations.

-Pray together.

Rebuild the love……….a litte bit..every day.

And..um…Leave some things..unsaid.

“I have learned that only two things are necessary to keep one’s wife happy. First, let her think she’s having her own way. And second, let her have it.”
Lyndon B. Johnson

“My husband and I divorced over religious differences. He thought he was God, and I didn’t.”

Success in marriage does not come merely through finding the right mate, but through being the right mate.
Barnett R. Brickner

My wife says I never listen to her. At least I think that’s what she said. Ha.

What say Y’all sweet friends?

Open Trackbacks all weekend!

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

G’head, don’t be shy………Shed your ‘gender stereotypes’, girls…after all …….your’e just like men.

Women, since the dawn of time, have been ascribed with derogatory terms for certain se-xual behaviors, and even ways of dressing.
W-h-ore, s-lut, sk-ank, bi-tch, “easy”, har-lot, fallen woman, ho-o-ker, str-umpet, tr-amp, fl-oozy, hu-ssy, loo-se woman…….and on and on ad nauseum.

A girl or woman who engages in s-exual activity with more than one, or many partners is, of course…a sl-ut.
What is a boy or man who engages in s-exual activity with more than one, or many partners called?

When one wants to defame or hurt a woman, the first label she receives is a se-xual put-down.

But, what is a pro-stitute or wh-ore in reality?
They are girls and women defined and judged exclusively through their se-xual behavoir. They are condescended to in the harshest manner as being immoral, corrupt, degenerate and depraved.

Male immorality or debauchery is excused as being “natural” and almost uncontrollable, once a man is “teased” or aroused.

And since men are ruled by their hormones, they can never be responsible for their “acting out”, infidelities, or shameless behavior, right?
Hence, the woman he cheated with is the “home wrecker”. The young girl at work who tempted him is the one the wife goes ‘gunning for’. Her fellow woman becomes her own enemy.

The new pseudo “empowerment” of women, which supposedly grants her rights to se-xual autonomy, by shedding all female modesty, encouraging promiscuity and assertiveness, proves to be unnatural, unfulfilling and ultimately do women more harm than many of the restrictions she suffered prior to ‘liberation.’

Men tend to be rational, active creatures, not nearly as emotional as their female counterparts. But women, striving to prove they “are just like men”, deny their emotional needs and falsify their true selves when they pretend that one night stands are “really” what they want, and that po-rn-ography is great for their love relationships.
The truth is that women want love, respect, and yes- commitment,-just as they always have, but are petrifried to admit it.

There is nothing more misogynistic than the lie that women dressing in a hyper-se-xualized way is somehow affirming and “empowering.”

Displaying oneself as a se-xual commodity……….is the antithesis of female humanity and grace.

Although men are perfectly capable of controlling their physiology and s-exual functions, oftentimes, they perceive women in provocative clothing as offering an invitation or availabilty. (Why else is she exposing her br-easts or legs?) It creates confusion at best, and anger, hostility, and even rage, when the male is rebuffed and scolded “for looking”, at worst.

Woman, by her very nature, has always taken the moral high ground, and (whether society admits it or not), usually drags her unsuspecting boyfriend or husband along for the ride.

When women abdicate that role, and deny their own womanhood, men too, get the message, that yes, women do exist solely for the purpose of se-xually entertaining and servicing men. (Why else would she strut around in red, 6 inch stilettoes, with her cle-avage in his face?)

The only purpose of a skin tight, low cut, form fitting dress is to be se-xually provcative.
There is nothing natural or comfortable about it.

But at least, let us be honest about the wearer’s intentions shall we.

Hundreds of years after women were forcibly bound into corsets, they now willingly stick their feet into shoes that an acrobat would have difficulty maintaining balance in.

As tragic as it is, women will always be judged and vulnerable, as a result, –by their se-xual attractiveness and identity.
Women, are trained to live for the exterior. For the male glances. How many heads did she turn?

Diet, excercise and plastic surgery are the main topics in nearly every womens’ magazine on the shelves throughout the free world.

Women now imprison themselves by their own willing objectification.

Supposedly “liberated” girls and women who are intellectually or musically gifted, who are supreme athletes, are still objectified. They play tennis in what almost looks like their underwear and and pose as “models” wearing skimpy clothes for magazine covers. Despite their intellect. Despite their talent.

Clearly, for a girl……….talent is not enough.

She’s soooooooooo hot.
He’s hot.

Being called “hot” is simply a demeaning, expolitative way of saying “someone I would want to have s-ex with.”

Teachers are rated by students.
No one thinks twice about calling even their doctor or nurse “hot.”

Judging people , and women in particular, by their se-xual appeal,- has become so the norm and has saturated our culture so much that instead of being insulted or at least taken aback, women are flattered when a student calls them “hot.”

Encouraging our society to want dancers to be “hot”, a.k.a -”se-xy” and musicians and athletes to be “hot” and even their brain surgeons to be “hot” is manipulative, and even warped. The se-xiness of your doctor is none of your concern. It is inapproriate at best, and perverse at worst.

It is time to take a long, hard look and re-think our social attitudes, and se-xual mores.

And no, I don’t want some kid telling me this article was “hot.”

Embracing respect for women with my friends at Rosemary’s Thoughts, 123beta, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, Stuck On Stupid, Big Dog’s Weblog, Phastidio.net, InvestorBlogger, Cao’s Blog, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, Nuke Gingrich, Faultline USA, third world county, Walls of the City, The World According to Carl, Blue Star Chronicles, Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, and Wolf Pangloss, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.