This woman is 80 years old.
Talk about yer inspiration eh?

Wooooooooooeeeeeeeeee!

Watch the whole thing…..

This should be me!

How many women give up dancing in middle age simply because they are labelled “grannies” and can not even find a partner willing to dance with them.

I personally know many.

Male men seeking partners can be up to 90 years old, but they most often request women partners between the ages of 20-45.

I mean who wants to dance with some shrivelled up, wrinkled hag when they can waltz around with a girl young enough to be their grand-daughter?

After all, women, most especially dancers….are all about the s-ex appeal.

The se-xless “older woman” is the brunt of all sorts of humor in our culture. Go look at some greeting cards if you don’t believe me.

Images of womens’ bodies are literally– everywhere.
Womens’ body parts are used to market just about ..well — everything.

Movies and television actresses must now look younger, thinner, thinner and thinner.
In these difficult economic times, don’t fret about the cosmetic or diet product industries.

They are guaranteed growth and profits, and lots of it.

We don’t even need the many research studies that show how constant exposure to images of young, thin, air-brushed female bodies is associated with subsequent depression, loss of self-esteem and the development of unhealthy eating habits in both girls and women.
It’s common sense.

How many husbands turn to wives and ask the dreaded question:
Do I look fat in this?

This 80 year old dancer is remarkable.
Perhaps the 80 year old, and 70, 60, 50 and 40 year old men will re-consider…and next time…ask a lady such as this :
WOULD YOU CARE TO DANCE?

(but don’t hold your collective breath)

Steppin out with my friends at The Pink Flamingo, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Political Byline, third world county, Democrat=Socialist, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and Conservative Cat, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Psssssst…. Don’t forget your daily duty guyz n dollz!

Click on the image to go vote!

The family of a 14-year-old Afghan rape victim face prosecution after her foetus was removed without anaesthetic.

The mother and brother of the girl are accused of cutting her open with a razor blade to perform an abortion.

Doctors say the girl is in a critical condition….
Afghan foetus ‘aborted by razor’
Rape victims and their families in Afghanistan often feel ashamed to report what has happened because people may think the victim consented to s-ex.

S-ex outside marriage is illegal in Afghanistan.
The girl stayed at home for three or four days in her condition until her father took her to hospital…

“He said a dog had bitten her so that people in the area wouldn’t know what had really happened.”

The victims of rape and their families in Afghanistan are often afraid to admit what has happened to them because of the stigma and shame attached to the issue.

Sometimes the victims are murdered by their own families.

Loving Moderate Muzlim mother and brother (who are just like you and me, according to Liberals), cut their own daughter and sister open with a razor blade.

Loving Muzlim father tells the world she “got a dog bite.”

Yup. Exacly like you and I.
If this is what they do to their own daughters, Do you doubt what they would do to yours?

“Celebrating” their Asshura:

But but but, according to the Left, Muzlims worldwide are our “peace partners”.
In fact, Soon to be (not my ) President Hussein O. is plannin a chat with Ham-ASS even as we speak.
Obama camp ‘prepared to talk to Hamas’

Um…Whatever happened to “The United States doesn’t negotiate with terrorists”?

Oh, because Ham-ASS isn’t threatening the U.S.(right this minute), it means we should have a cup o’ tea and “talk” with them?

What’s this obsession with peace anyways?

Insisiting on something you can not get is not exactly…um….fruitful.

While most civilized folk see peace as a worthwhile goal, The Muzlim world does not.

-Cutting open your daughter with a razor after she was raped..with NO anesthesia.

-Celebrating a holiday by slitting your infants head with a knife..while the media yawns?

These are not remotely civilized people.Go to a Muzlim country ..then again..if your’e Jewish or Christian, you may be denied entry.

See the misery and oppression it fosters, witness the ignorance, illiteracy, hate, intolerance, anti homosexuality, misogynism and torture it encourages.

At best , the West and free world can hope for a balance of power.

But instead of racial profiling and never having allowed Muzlim immigration after Sept 11, 2001, they choose to live eternally in fear of being attacked: AGAIN.

Negative reinforcement is what works with terrorists.
Not tea and crumpets.

Constantly talking about peace is seen as a sign of weakness by Muzlims. It is nothing but an invitation to more aggression.

Defeat and eventual elimination of the infidels is the goal of true Izlam. Read it for yourself.

And while Bush and the rest of the free world legitimizes Izlam, the reality is that they are vile and corrupt like in any other Nazi like hierarchy.

Their leaders worldwide have made their interests plane.
In their eyes religion and government are one.

The role their so called religion plays is a crystal clear agenda of world domination.
Izlam is not by definition a religion, nor is it to be treated as sacrosanct.

It is an outgrowth of Muuha-MAD’s conquests, imperialism and tortures and merely an extension of their governments’ policies of destroying the “infidels”. (a.k.a. pigs and dogs)

The very first rule of any confilct is to understand your opponent.

That has yet to done, by any, other than Geert Wilders, who now lives under 24 hour surveillance because of it.

Hussein Obama and his leftard drones are nothing but cultural imperialists , who insist that a non-Western mentality is really ”just like you and me”.

We’re all one. NOT.

Hussein wants to “talk” to terrorist Ham-ASS?
Maybe he should meet with Osama too while he’s at it.

I didn’t think it was possible to stoop low enough to talk to them.
Guess Hussein O. will prove me wrong.

Coming soon:
To a backyard barbeque near you:

Open Trackbacks all weekend!

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

British star Kate Winslet’s latest film, in which she plays a former concentration camp guard with an insatiable se-xual appetite, has been panned for using her “nub-ile body” to trivialise the Holocaust.

Winslet bares all in post-war drama The Reader and has said the role pushed her “to the brink”, but the recent criticism could cost her an Oscar nomination next month.

Critics pan Winslet’s Nazi film

At a private screening of the film last week, influential film critic Charlie Finch attacked the film, arguing Winslet’s sexual escapades were out of place, the Sunday Times reports.

“It trivialises the Holocaust,” he said.

“What is repellent is how Daldry uses Kate Winslet’s nubile body to create sympathy for a repellent character. [Director Stephen] Daldry avoided showing the horror of her crimes - instead we have Holocaust chic which is all about sex, not mass murder.”

Winslet plays Hanna Schmitz, a middle-aged tram conductor in post-war Berlin who has an affair with a teenage boy.

The boy is played by German actor David Kross, who had to wait until his 18th birthday before he was allowed to film the sex scenes.

After the film’s release, Jews riot, blow up embassies and burn cars. Sorry, my bad. Wrong religion.
Jews do nothing.

Reality check:
Showing womens’ bodies nu-de has one purpose and one only: To se-xually excite men.

Graphic se-x and violence on television and in movies is intended to excite male lust and to produce an adrenaline rush in you.

The dirty little secret that no wants to really believe is that it makes it impossible to respect women without objectifying their bodies and it desensitizes you not only to the victim’s pain in the film but also to the debasement of the perpetrator.

Not to mention that most films glorify casual se-x, violence and the people who engage in it.

Instead of Kate’s body parts ………..in all her n-ude glory…………..
Perhaps the director could have shown this:

Artificial limbs of Auschwitz concentration camp victims.
Oh sorry, that wouldn’t exactly sell tickets.

Many legitimize viewing se-xual scenes, which should be held with honor between a loving man and woman, or watching horrific. graphic brutality as “entertainment”.

In other words: the celebration of promiscuity and savagery.

Graphic nu-dity or violence has no “artistic” value.

What it does have, however, is the abiltity to sell mass quantities of tickets to of 16-35 year old males, the demographic group, who will most likely purchase the tickets now that they know a star will be nu-de.

It is quite possible for a film to show fighting, war, injury and even death without pints of blood splattering everywhere and unending gore.
It is more possible to demonstrate undying love by not showing s-ex, but by actually showing acts of Love.

Anyone who can justify nu-dity in a film about the Holocaust is not honestly trying to advance the message of the film, or perhaps the message is meant to be lost entirely - while people can measure the size and shape of the actress’s body parts afterwards.

What’s that you say? It was a crucial part of the story line?
Right. Then it’s high time producers and writers use their creativity to find other ways to “enhance” the plot or teach the same lessons.

A Holocaust film.
Perhaps a slightly higher order thinking which actually explores the complexity of human behavior should be undertaken.

They have such a dire need to “display bodies” eh?
THIS is the Holocaust:

You want graphic violence.
Look no farther than the Nazis:

Thrilling the male audience with glimpses of s-ex is hardly the way to exhibit the revulsion and horror known as: The Holocaust.

But don’t fret Ms. Winslet.
You’re safe as long as no pets were harmed and no Muslims were “offended” during the making of the “film.”

Sharing the disgrace with my friends at Rosemary’s Thoughts, third world county, Walls of the City, The World According to Carl, DragonLady’s World, The Pink Flamingo, Leaning Straight Up, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Spain’s Basketball Federation has published a good luck advert for their men’s team, the world champions, in which they stand pulling at the sides of their eyes in a slit-eyed gesture.

There is no obvious intention to upset their Olympic hosts in Beijing, but the irresponsible picture is likely to cause controversy and could be interpreted so as to lead to accusations of racism.

Olympics: Spain basketball team pictured in controversial pose

Where does humor end and racism begin?

Racism seems to connote when there is malice involved, does it not?
Is it never acceptable to mock, mimic or poke fun at others different than ourselves?

“White people” have long been thought to be the ones responsible for keeping the blacks down, even now. That belief gave carte blanche to poke fun at “crackers” and “whitey”, insisting whitebread had better laugh along with the perennial put downs.

Some go so far as to say “white people”, as a generalization is racist in and of itself.

Why is it socially acceptable and cool if your skin is brown and you’re “down” like one of da bros - to rant ’bout “nappy hair” or “hoes” till da cows come home and never be accused of using negative stereotypes toward white or black women?

When did it become acceptable to tease when the joke teller is of the ethnic group, religion, gender or minority themselves?

Women have been the brunt of hurtful, even inciteful humor since the dawn of civilization.
Women themselves participate in their own self effacement.

Jokes habitually target womens’ bodies or anatomy. These derogatory comments are supposed to be ‘all in jest’…. no matter how personal or crude.

To accept race-based or anti woman humor as innocent and all in fun… is to step down a very, dangerous path.
Making fun of Jews or women due to physical or ethnic idiosyncrasies was within acceptable limits in our culture.

The consequences, however, were generations of Jews and women who saw insulting them as accepted social behavior, which they begain to even partake in themselves.

Wouldn’t you agree that routine ridicule of women, (and it is routine), or the prejudicial singling out of racial groups is what should give us pause?

Then again, How about using humor to drive the point home?

Have the unending depictions and ridicule of Christianity not pushed the limits of good taste over and over again?

After all…What are the origins of prejudice?

Thousands of generations ago, we were nomadic, even tribal beings. Suspicion of and scuffles with other tribes were essential in maintaining tribal boundaries and preserving hunting grounds to ensure the future of ones kinfolk.

We are a product of this evolution, are we not.
Suspicion and notions of mistrust of others who are “different” is quite normal and natural.

Thankfully, most of us have evolved and developed the intelligence to understand our history, as well as the social structures which permit us to break down “tribal” barriers without the need to first club each other over the head.

Just picture two friends, (or yourself for that matter) who have broken down these barriers that may have existed. They can tell each other jokes that refer to the other’s “tribal” differences, without either one losing their heads.
It’s all about security and trust.

Notice, I said ‘most of us’.
Apparently, some never laugh.

However, if whites, women, Jews and Christians are fair game…………….
Why are we silenced when trying to laugh at Muzlims or Arabs?
Can we not snicker at the bloodthirsty monsters who call themselves Ham-ASS, or, occasionally snort at the compliant stooges who call themselves “moderates”, who never speak out against terrorism by their brethren and truly hate the “West”?

Is not all fair in love and jest?
Just askin.

And now……….

Funny?

Not funny?

Chinese

Thug lover

Hussein Obama fan

Aussie

Italian

Irish

Heh. What say y’all, my funny friends?

Today,………..Bush paid another visit to the American athletes, watching the women warm up for softball, regretting the disappearance of that sport from the next Olympics

“It’s good for the world to have girls playing softball and these women are going to show young girls how to win” and trying his hand, so to speak, at volleyball.

Pres. Bush declines to slap Misty May-Treanor’s bikinied butt

Bush knuckled off a couple of lobs, but defending gold medalists Misty May-Treanor and Kerri Walsh gave the chief executive some pointers.

Then after a good play, in the tradition of female volleyballers,
May-Treanor turned, bent over slightly and offered her bikinied rear-end for the 43rd president to slap.

“Mr. President,” she said, “want to?”

Want to has nothing to do with it in public life.

As the son of a president, a husband of nearly 37 years, the father of two daughters, the subject of some attempted tabloid exposes and a seasoned political veteran, who is not a female athlete but knows that every camera for a half-mile is trained on him, Bush wisely chose instead to brush his hand across the small of May-Treanor’s back.

Edited version of Misty May-Treanor extended her back side to the President of the United States:

No. It’s not cute. No. It’s not “all in good fun.”
The President of the United States deserves respect, as does his wife and two daughters.

Female volleyball medalists Misty May-Treanor and Kerri Walsh’s bodies are splattered all over the internet in their barely there bikinis hugging our President today.

Do you suppose they could have grabbed a cover-up before taking a picture with the President of the United States of America?
The shame of it all is that it wouldn’t even occur to them.

Female modesty has suffered a tragic death in popular culture.

Try to find information on female modesty and you will get this:

Is there no happy medium between this horrid misogyny and our carefree denial of the honor due the female body?

Mr. President says: “..these women are going to show young girls how to win”.

They’re apparently going to show young girls how to disrespect themselves, and teach men how to do so as well.

Now before the men start ranting about how American and cool it is to admire human female anatomy (in this case– the back end of it), and before the women start defending how “innocent” and sweet” this all this….

Stop to think: …………….with your Minds, that is.

A bit of background:

The first Olympics are held in ancient Greece. Women are excluded.

Thousands of years later…………………..

The Amateur Sports Act was passed in 1978. It required the United States Olympic Committee and its National Governing Bodies for each sport to operate in a nondiscriminatory manner.

It wasn’t until Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 that a federal law prohibited sex discrimination in any educational program or activity at any educational institution.

Meaning: They required that women and men be provided an equitable opportunity to participate in sports.

One of Title IX’s purpose’s was to create the same opportunity and quality of treatment for female athletes as is afforded male athletes.

While participation of women has quadrupled over the last few decades, respect and “quality of treatment” of women has plummeted to an all time low in society.

Cheerleaders, which are nothing but young, “firm” girls and women sexualizing themselves, have always been considered a “publicity service”, and well……..it’s all about ratings.

S-ex appeals to men…and men………..bring up the ratings.

Math anyone?

What is the Amercian dream of an athlete at the Olympics?
Why do we root for them?

Because we believe that hard work, discipline and self-reliance should be rewarded.
It is one of our cultures central ideologies.

If Sports competitions are truly about talent, self-determination and individuality, why the focus on female anatomy again and again and again?

Could it be the clothing women insist on wearing less of year after year after year?

It’s unnecessary. It’s crude. It’s cheap. And it cheapens the sport and the flag they play under.

Who designs these “uniforms” for women that do nothing less than allow most of their body parts to hang out. And why.

Ratings. For whom..why men of course.

Let’s make sure men never forget that it’s not about the tennis prowess, the basketball skill, the volleyball expertise, the swimming proficiency, the skiing dexterity, the gymnastic competency.
It’s all about “her body”, and how much sexuality she exuuuudes.

Nowhere is this self exploitation more evident than in Hollywood’s many manipulations of what is beautiful and how women should look.

But in Sports?

Women have historically been marginalized or completely excluded from organized sports.
Women were told that they do not possess the appropriate aspects of masculinity, are lacking in physical strength and self-confidence.

Now that they have broken some barriers, women are told it is all about “empowerment.”

“Female empowerment” within popular culture is a joke.
The eroticized female body is the sole image that is acceptable.

Women’s sports are blatantly using sex appeal to sell their players. Careers of tennis stars Maria Sharapova and Anna Kournikova (can she even play anymore?) are based almost entirely on how sexy they are.And what they “wont be wearing” at the next match.

Being ogled and lusted after.
Is that the goal of an Olympian athlete these days?

Indeed. Let us consider the ways in which representations of women in sports and individual athletes have evolved over time:

Cheerleaders in the 1950’s:

Women’s basketball:

Women’s baseball:

Target Practice:

Hockey:

Running:

Swimming:

Tennis:

Golf:

Notice how all these activities can be done dressed. Go figure.

Women compromise the honor they were given, as human beings created in the image of God, when they encourage men to view them as sexual objects.

Women now have the “right” to wear, or not wear whatever they want. And apparently, are excercising that one to the max.

What will Misty May-Treanor be remembered for ultimately?
Her athletic ability? Her strength? Her skill? Her medal?
No.
Her butt.

How adorable.

Someday, I suspect, this will come back to haunt her…………. and all women who were cheapened by her actions, and intelligent enough to realize just how much.

Sharing honor of women with lgf, and Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Rosemary’s Thoughts, A Blog For All, Right Truth, Shadowscope, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, Phastidio.net, Leaning Straight Up, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, Nuke’s, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, A Newt One- Congressman Frank Wolf!, third world county, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

A member of the Saudi religious police has been accused of having six wives at the same time - two more than allowed under religious laws, reports say.
Saudi accused of having six wives

The 56-year-old was detained in south-western Jizan province…
The accused denies the women are all currently his wives and says he has divorced two of them.

Mus-lim men can keep up to four wives at a time under sh-aria, or Is-lamic law, which is applied in Sa-udi Arabia.

When Four just isn’t enough…

I mean how else can they pander to insatiable, perverse Muzlim lust, populate the face of the earth, and um.. colonize the world for All-ah, huh?

Must be all bout the “cultural issues” again right?

We Westerners, just don’t understand that some murder their own sisters and daughters over clothing.
Murder Charge for Brother Whose Sister Shed Scarf

The brother of a Canadian teenager who was slain in what friends described as a family dispute over a Muslim head scarf was charged with murder, becoming the second family member accused in her death, police said Friday.
Their father Muh-ammad Par-vez, 57, was charged with first-degree murder earlier this month. He had been a suspect since shortly after her death.

We close minded Westerners simply refuse to think of our daughters or wives as property.

…who can be summarily tossed in the garbage heap if they refuse to comply with the wishes of the “man of da house” or those charming Saudi cultural dictates.

Marrying six girls or women? Divorcing them at will?

No problemo for Izlamopathics.

If you do not respect women, you will respect nothing.

Don’t hold your breath for any “human rights” leftists or Hollyweirdos either. They conveniently turn a blind eye to this alleged… “culture” of emotionally-backward misogynists when they are not venerating it and soaking in its victimhood.

The Soros socialist leftards are way too busy spending their time propagating how evil America, our Military and George Bush are, remember?

For once let us be honest my friends.

There simply exists no common ground between Izlam and the West, Izlam and America, or Izlam and Israel.

Our entire culture is based upon the recognition and preservation of fundamental God-given human rights.

Theirs um………isn’t.

I can tell ya one thing.
This aint goin to end pretty.

I’m thinkin messy, epic Battle.

Honoring women with y’all and my friends over at Perri Nelson’s Website, Rosemary’s Thoughts, Mark My Words, 123beta, Adam’s Blog, Right Truth, Shadowscope, The Amboy Times, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, Pursuing Holiness, Nuke’s, third world county, DragonLady’s World, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, , and Dumb Ox Daily News, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

“We wanted to revamp the headscarf,”explains Domenico Dolce, “give it a new life and introduce it to a younger generation. Our aim was to give it a modern and cool twist.”
Scarves are making headlines once again

According to Dennis Nothdruft, curator of London’s Fashion and Textile Museum, this headscarf resurgence is about a new sense of chastity in fashion.

“Before peasants used them to keep their heads cool, women wore headscarves in medieval times to maintain their modesty,” he explains.

Given that the fashion world likes nothing better than provocation, isn’t it also a nod to Islam? “There’s no doubt that we have a huge Muslim clientèle,” agrees Alexander. “But this is more about a return to that elegant Grace Kelly era than anything else.”

So, will this strange amalgam of royal homeliness, Muslim chic and proletarian pretence ever take off? Come autumn, will we be seeing women ambling down high streets or queueing at the cold meat counter in Waitrose, looking like Russian peasants.

Terrorist chic all over again.

“A new sense of chastity in fashion”?..Ha. Are they kidding?
Chastity and modern fashions are mutually exclusive.

Try puttin a burka on them eh.

Designers and women who don their monstrosities wouldn’t know modesty or chastity if it hid them smack on their bared cl-eavages or exposed midriffs.

And about that “huge Muslim clientèle”?..Aw..just a coincidence right?

Certainly we get NO historical context whatsoever regarding the adorable new headscarf either. Priceless.
It’s not enough that Muzlim women get their throats slit by their own fathers for not donning the “veil”, but the compulsion has even spread to NON Muzlim women:

NON-Muslim English girls will be ordered to wear headscarves at a new Islamic school.
Madani High School in Leicester will take ten per cent of its pupils from other faiths ? but insists all must cover their heads.

Headteachers ruled the hijab scarf is part of the uniform.
Non-Muslims ‘must wear hijab’
Assistant principal Zainab Elgaziari said the demand was not a problem despite the row over Muslim women’s veils.

He said: “I can’t see why if a student wears a headscarf it should be an issue. It’s the same as a shirt or tie ? it’s just part of our uniform.”

There are literally thousands of examples.

Pick a Muzlim country. Any country.
C’mon. Do it.

Do women have a choice? ha. Nice joke.
Just posing the question belies the ignorance of the masses regarding compulsion in Izlam.

Fashion Designers thrive on to pushing the boundaries of social sensibilities.

But not apparently when it comes to the “styles” of Izlam.

After all …So what if Muham-MAD fought unprovoked battles, raided merchant caravans, beheaded thousands of innocent people, married multiple women…um….. including a nine-year old girl. Oh, did I mention that he was 54 years old at the time?

Oh, and while wer’e at it………Let’s not forget flat out murder of women shall we.

Check out the lovely lil Kooranic verse (4:34):

Men are the maintainers of women because All—ah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as All—ah has guarded; and as to those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely All–ah is High, Great.

Uh huh.

Dontcha jus love the fashion worlds’ touch of legitimizing Izzlamic male violence against women by makin the “headscarf” all trendy and chic?

Oh lookie here. It comes in all colors.

Out of all the possible hat comebacks….

Not exactly this, now is it?

Of course, muzlim men (if you can call them that)..must preserve the morals and principles of Izlam…poor things. Must be a full time job keepin those girlz in line.

We all know how much female “honor” is prized and female sex-ual purity exalted (even if they do cut out womens’ genit-als.)

Why an entire family can be cast out if a female member brings shame upon it. And needless to say - the only way to restore peace is through violence. Men beating and killing their own wives and daughters.

What do these fashionistas think..that the headscarf and forced modesty happens in some sort of social vacuum?

Muzlims are acculturated to the belief that women who break taboos deserve to be beaten, even killed. Of course this all for the common good.

And yes………it’s all voluntary. Rrrright.

The controversial local laws inspired by sharia are now being applied to non-Muslim citizens. Female students who do not wear the headscarf are suspended, and few have the courage to rebel, because of fear of reprisals from fundamentalists.
In Padang, Islamic law is now imposed on all
Among the other norms inspired by sharia, they recall the obligation for students in the elementary schools to learn the Qur’an by heart.

So just how many girls and women are living in constant fear of the men in their households– enduring silent, anonymous suffering with their trendy new lil headscarf eh?

Chic indeed.

Open Trackbacks all weekend!

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

Marc Jacobs, Salvatore Ferragamo, Givenchy and Alexander McQueen may to get their bi-focals adjusted.

Apparently, they can’t tell the genders apart anymore.

Andro: meaning male. Gyn: meaning female. Which is which?

Make no mistake. We are not addressing those born with both male and female gen-itals. We are calling out those that state there is such a thing as psychological androgyny.
How cool to combine both masculinity and femininity as traits of some unified, mutated gender eh?

When women began to flood the workforce, “borrowin from da boys” was routine.

Manly power suits were all the rage.

Clothes were meant to project a somewhat austere and certainly- professional image.

No frills or flowing hair. Dress shirts, blazers, and even wide-legged pants became the norm. Some women even pulled back their hair back in a bun, and saved the matching scarves and bags for nighttime.

But alas……… “handsome girls” weren’t enough.

Not only did women discard the professional look for bearing cl-eavage at work, donning str-ipper stilletoes and baring midriffs— Men have to now be “pretty boys”.

Androgyny in fashion is no mere “trend” my friends. It is a profound social phenomenon.

Remember Boy George, David Bowie, and Prince? The epitome of sexual ambiguity. Howzabout Michael Jackson who personifies androgyny with his high pitched, falsetto voice and effeminate ways.

Needless to say, the lefties and Hollyweird bozos insist their female stars perform equally well in all the exciting moves and dangerous stunts as their male counterparts…provided they dress scantily and sluttify themselves while they’re punchin out the mean guys, of course.

The underlying and not so subtle aim is to blur and haze the line between men and womens’wear, thus blurring the line between men and women period.

After all, the kool aid drinkers will tell ya there are no distinct masculine or feminine traits or attributes to begin with, right?

Prancin around half nekked is “empowering” for women?

That’s called elevating women’s status in male-oriented societies? Ha.
Softening the image of men? How has that helped the relations between men and women?

Here’s the charming result:

-Lower childbirth rates because “working” women tend to delay marriage, (if they marry at all) or wayyy past their prime for childbearing.

-A higher divorce rate due to so many factors. Marriages literally collapsing because both “working” parents can’t be bothered to spend enough time together or with their children.

-An astronomical increase of unmarried people as more and singles enjoy their financial independence and supposed “freedom.” Uh huh.

“Family unit erosion” for the Libs? No problemo. Who needs a traditional family unit when you got the gummint right?

But, while they feverishly attempt to alter the perception of human nature, some of us know that God in His infinite wisdom, created human nature as consisting of opposite sex roles which ultimately unify- as two complimentary roles in the sanctity of marriage.

It’s all part of their spiffy lil global plan for our Universe.
Borders should disappear, Cultures (irrespective of their “lack of culture”) should blend, blend, blend..and markets all over the world should merge, merge, merge.

Inna meantime…The gay ahem..”liberation” movement pounced on the idea of androgyny. Sure, it gives les-bians and ho-mose-xual men a once in a life time opportunity to display their so-called “gender characteristics” openly in society. No political agenda eh?

We are all one.

Despots? Jeehadis? Illegal, criminal immigrants?
Join the luvfest.

Wearing lace and ribbons and sharing with y’all and my friends over at The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson’s Website, Right Truth, Shadowscope, DragonLady’s World, Stuck On Stupid, Leaning Straight Up, Big Dog’s Weblog, Cao’s Blog, Democrat=Socialist, Conservative Cat, nuke gingrich, Faultline USA, third world county, The World According to Carl, , Gulf Coast Hurricane Tracker, Wolf Pangloss, , and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

In the battle of the sexes, women’s magazine editor Cynthia Good said this was a skirmish she had to fight.

‘Men At Work’ signs to disappear in Atlanta
Decision follows complaints by magazine editor.
Across Atlanta they stood, orange signs with black letters that read “Men At Work” or “Men Working Ahead.”
Sometimes, the signs stood next to women working alongside the men.

Good demanded Atlanta officials remove the signs and last week, Atlanta Public Works Commissioner Joe Basista agreed.
Score one for gender equality, Good said Wednesday.

I wonder if these “feminists” have any prob with these signs:

Lesse now.

Men working. Signs.

Rape and forced marriages of one year olds in Muzlimville isn’t a “skirmish” any American feminists feel compelled to “fight” eh?
Female genital mutilation doesn’t even warrant a peep.

Bet the feminist “Change the signs” brigade never even heard of Ghada Jamshir.

Please watch:

Do ya ever hear so much as an utterance from feminists about Shaaaaaria law, where women’s rights do not even exist?

How bout outrage toward Arabic countries where there exist no women’s support groups, no shelters for women trying to leave abusive husbands or other family members, namely their own fathers, brothers or male cousins.

Muzlim women get 3 things: orders, unending suffering, and death.

Rrrright. Try takin it off dollface.

What they have the unmitigated Izlamic gall to call “honor killings” are part and parcel of Izlam. You will find them in every single Muzlim society on the globe.

And guess what, now that we and Europe have welcomed this death cult onto our shores -they are even happening right here in these United States of America.

Any feminist murmur bout this yet?

Oh. And how bout those “muuut’ah” marriages..ya know those convenient lil temporary marriages, which are nothing more than a thinly-disguised system of prostitution eh?

Se-xual enslavement and perversions presented in the Koooran and the haaadiths are among the best kept secrets about Izlam. Only we’re on to you.

Indeed. “Western” women are too busy raging about being able to do construction work like one of da boys, be fire”men”, and be just as strong as their fellow police”men” in their struggle to be accepted as “equal” partners.

I don’t know bout y’all, but if my loved one was trapped in a burning building, I’d want a MAN trying to hoist him down.

If I dial 911 because there’s a 6 foot perp mugging an old lady on the street, I’d want a MAN trying to subdue him.

As far as construction women bein all brawny, gettin all dirty and “working alongside the men”…….
Yea. Good on you for changin the signs.

Now how bout y’all go out there and REALLY help the cause of women huh.
Heck, I’ll even give you your very own sign.

Open Trackbacks all weekend!

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.

A backlash has begun against the all-must-have-prizes culture that has produced children used to getting their own way..
Our little emperors: does worrying do more harm than good?

As the mother of two young daughters,… is used to doling out praise for almost everything they do. Even she was taken aback, however, when her younger daughter, Rachel, now 5, arrived home from nursery clutching a certificate for “sitting nicely on the carpet”.

“It made me wonder what she was doing the rest of the time,” …. “I thought it was a bit over the top rewarding her for something so routine. But it’s part of a whole culture of stickers and smiley faces and ‘celebration assemblies’.”

The received wisdom on child-rearing says nothing should be allowed to damage a child’s sense of self-worth: just last week the Football Association (FA) decided to ban teams including children under eight from publishing their results, for fear of putting the kids under too much pressure if they lost a match.
It is becoming a worldwide trend. A recent production of Snow White at a primary school in Japan featured 25 Snow Whites, no dwarfs and no wicked witch, as parents objected to one child being picked out for the title role. In Sweden a boy was prevented from handing out invitations to his birthday party at school because he was “discriminating” against the two classmates he did not invite.

“Too many kids … are growing up without boundaries, without discipline and without the family structures they need,” he said. “We should bring back discipline and the idea of punishment.”

FYI. This amazing country of ours was built on strength and honor, not touchy feely dimwits who allow everyone to “win”, while eliminating all healthy competition and discipline.

The joy of witnessing these little 4 and 5 year old “rock stars” with their parents fawning over their every move..Uh huh… Asking children what they want for dinner, what they choose to wear, how they “feel” every 15 seconds.

Guess what folks?
Everyone is NOT always a winner.

Common sense, responsibilty for oneself, respect for authority and decency have all been deep sixed in favor of “feeling good alla time.”

These touchy feely kids grow up not giving a fig for anyone but their sorry, self centered selves.
As adults, they remain coddled and over-indulged just as much as children.

Our Pop Idol culture offers “prizes” for every job well done.
What does our culture value? Pushiness, self-centeredness and attention-seeking behaviors seem to be prized far above talent and discipline for men. Looks, thinness, and sexualizing themselves is what is prized for women.

Giving kids a medal for helping tidy his desk or everytime he manages to “sit still”?

How many more rewards, stickers, smiley faces,and dang star charts do these children have to get before they realize this behavior should be expected, not rewarded?

Howzabout we teach our kids to be independent, allow them to fail and actually learn from it. Hmmmm.

To be polite and courteous , yes, and oooh… even competitive!
They will run circles around the little snowflakes who run to mommy (and eventually to government), to complain about every challenge life throws at them.

Between you and me, a huge part of this fiasco has been generated (out of guilt),by women who work long hours outside of the home, spend little time with their children, and have “nannies” do what “mommy” ideally should be doing.
But despite their absentee mothering…………
Their children must be seen by all as a pinnacle of their achievements in life.

You can choose to be your child’s friend, or your child’s parent.

Being buddies may is easier, but only the latter is really raising a child.
The “friendship” part kicks in…when they are much older…and IF, you actually raised them.

Open Trackbacks guys and dolls.

Other BlogWorthies:

Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read.

All I request is that you return the favor by linking the article you wish to share …..to this post. Thanks!

And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments and drop your pearls o’ widsom..Heh.