All together now class……in English……..
[audio:Whitney Houston - USA National Anthem - The Star- Spangled Banner.mp3]
All together now class……in English……..
[audio:Whitney Houston - USA National Anthem - The Star- Spangled Banner.mp3]
“On May 1, immigrants, both legal and illegal, will purportedly take to the streets to:
*Call for–which is just the politically correct way of saying “demand”–amnesty for the unknown millions within the United States, and…
*Demand that the U.S. government pass no legislation that even hints at real law and order at the border, or consequences for those who would upset that law and order.”
May 1: Illegal Immigration Day goes on…
“Organizers and the mainstream media have come to call the protest scheduled for May 1, or “May Day.” But in the big town–Manhattan, New York–it is more like “They-Day.”
Unfortunately for our illegal friends, the cumulative effect of the “spontaneous” protests of a few weeks past coupled with the impending and well-planned civil-disobedience of May 1 have created a sea of resentment across America, numbering many more millions than those who will protest on May 1.
Listen to union official Jorge Rodriguez who helped organize earlier rallies aimed at intimidating Congress as it debates the issue of immigration. “There will be 2 to 3 million people hitting the streets in Los Angeles alone. We’re going to close down Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Tucson, Phoenix, Fresno. We want full amnesty, full legalization for anybody who is here (illegally),” Rodriguez said. “That is the message that is going to be played out across the country on May 1.”
But this is America! Land of opportunity! So it is only in America that, besides millions of law breakers crowding the streets, there will be a song to herald their arrival.
Thanks to British music producer Adam Kidron, illegal immigrants can now break the law under the soothing and “patriotic” backdrop of the Spanish “Star Spangled Banner,” or otherwise known as “Nuestro Himno,” or “Our Anthem.”
Indeed. Only in America. ”
OK. What do we know?
We know that every single year the Border Patrol is making more than a million apprehensions of people flagrantly violating our nation’s laws by unlawfully crossing U.S. borders to work and to receive publicly-funded services, often with the aid of fraudulent documents. (if they decide to work at all that is..)
We know that such entry is a misdemeanor and, if repeated, becomes punishable as a felony.
Congress has let it be known that as many as 12 million people are currently in our nation Ilegally.
We know that according the LAW: illegal immigrants are deportable under Immigration and Nationality Act Section 237 (a)(1)(B) which says:
“Any alien who is present in the United States in violation of this Act or any other law of the United States is deportable.”
We know that illegal immigrants are willing to work at substandard wages and working conditions which ultimatley depresses the wages of American workers.
We also know who is hit hardest by this- minority workers and those without high school degrees who are competing for the work illegals have “stolen” from right out under them.
We know that that nearly half of the illegal immigrants is comprised of visa overstayers, namely people who entered the country legally, but became illegal aliens by their failure to leave the U.S. upon expiration of their visa.
Once entry occurs, there is little chance of detection and virtually no chance of deportation, except for convicted criminals.
So someone please enlighten me…or all of us all for that matter…..
How are these illegal invaders able to obtain employment, public assistance benefits, public education, public housing, and every other taxpayer-funded benefit that legal citizens have rightfully earned?
And hey whoever said… Crime doesn’t PaY?
Linked to these great posts:
Know THE LAW my dear friends.
Knowledge is power.
Section 1325. Improper entry by alien
(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection;
misrepresentation and concealment of facts
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States
at any time or place other than as designated by immigration
or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration
or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United
States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the
willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first
commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or
imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent
commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or
imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
(b) Improper time or place; civil penalties
Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to
enter) the United States at a time or place other than as
designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil
penalty of -
(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or
attempted entry); or
(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of
an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under
Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not
in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be
(c) Marriage fraud
Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the
purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be
imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than
$250,000, or both.
(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud
Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise
for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws
shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance
with title 18, or both.
There you have it.
What part of LAW do the folks up in Washington and the lefty do-gooders fail to comprehend?
For more insights on illegal invaders and one proud American see third world county
“Pop group The Pussycat Dolls are set to become real-life dolls – toy firm Hasbro is creating plastic figurines of the sexy six-piece..” band.
Hasbro To Market Pussycat Dolls Toys Towards Six-Year-Olds
Hasbro says the $15 action figures are aimed at children aged six to nine, despite The Pussycat Dolls’ risqué image.
Sharon John, Hasbro’s general manager for marketing, explains, “I don’t think we’re trying to push the envelope any further, but we’re trying to add an aspect of “realism.”
Oh, you mean the new “reality” that girls are sex objects and that is somehow empowering?
The sexualization of children, little girls, before they can remotely process what sexuality is and years before they even have a chance to discover and explore their own sexuality- has become an epidemic.
Children are not equipped psychologically to interpret the sexual behaviour and conduct of pop stars and adults, but predictably try to imitate it. That is what companies like Hasbro bank on.
And while Hasbro and all the other companies who routinely use sex to sell-can cry “First Amendment”, sexualization of children and women is flat out dangerous.If common sense hasn’t told them, may I be the one to point out that children who dress and behave like adults are more vulnerable to sexual assault and abuse. The early sexualization of children has produced ever-earlier sexual activity, not to mention pregnancy among children.
We live in a sexually potent environment, which liberals seem to think is somehow “liberating.”
Before a child even reaches puberty, they have been exposed to thousands of sexual messages. Needless to say most of these messages are explicit, sensational, oftentimes violent, and almost always lack any mention of the importance of emotional commitment in sexual relationships.
Magazines with page after page of nearly nude women, sexual images on the internet, in movies, on the radio, crude sex talk among friends and peers, and sexual billboards. Sexual messages are literally everywhere and not only boys and men, but children are being exposed to them on a daily basis.
Is this the steady diet you wish to feed yours?
Let’s face facts. This is all supported by state governments, many of which mandate sex education as early as kindergarten. School nurses dispense contraceptives and abortion advice without even obtaining parental knowledge or approval.
Abercrombie & Fitch thought it is “cute” some years ago to portray little girls as eroticized future sex objects. They have even used words like “eyecandy” and “sexy” when pitching clothing lines to seven year old girls.
Hasbro has joined ranks with this growing “trend”.
The media’s sexualization of women and children should have been
outlawed before it ever came to this.
But alas, the staunch believers in NO censorship are reaping what they have sown.
There are schools of feminism who support the ideals of what they call “personhood”, as opposed to a strong, exclusive sense of identity as being a woman, or “womanhood.”
They consider the category of “womanhood” to be a socially, culturally constructed category. They don’t believe in inate differences between genders.
But despite all attempts to prove that men are women, and women are men……… “women” will remain a distinct category. And the only ones eligible are those who are biologically female.
Women are more vulnerable to physical abuse; women do get raped; and victimized due to their constitution as women.
Children do as well.
Our legislation has refused to acknowlede this. Women continue to get battered, raped, sexually harassed, stalked and abused by the thousands.
Children have been steadily joining those ranks.
Hasbro has no shame simply because nothing shames us any longer.
I believe it is high time that some obvious points be brought to light.
What Hasbro is doing is child abuse, and should be nothing less than illegal.
“America, while you were sleeping…
-We have opened the Pandora’s Box of political correctness, and with no end in sight.
-There have been over 30 million killed; we still cannot agree that two arms, two legs, and a head constitute a baby, but is instead referred to by the pro-choice lobby as “fetal tissue.”
-We have chased God out of the public square, and in His place have erected the hollow edifice of government.
-We have let the mainstream media go unchallenged far too long. The media has now almost become a political party unto themselves, and looks to sensationalize the news on behalf of their chosen political interest…
America, While You Were Sleeping… offers us..
-We have allowed “victimology” to become a way of life for the country’s so-called minority populace. That would be everyone except white males.
-We have given title and importance to such low-brow political types as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Michael Moore, and other liberal notables.
-We have witnessed the agenda of America’s plastic people in Hollywood. That these actors and the like should be paid any heed at all when their entire lives are wrapped up within the elitist and narcissistic bubble they live in, is simply wrong, and wasteful.
We have given too much latitude and forgiveness to America’s Isl-amic leadership and citizenry within the United States. Where were their much-needed voices regarding 9/11? Where the hell are they now?
-We have watched the Democratic Party declare that America’s biggest threat is not Osama bin Laden, North Korea, or even Iran. It is George W. Bush.”
Lest we forget sweet friends, during our slumber.
Since the maniacal terrorists attacked America, on our own soil, President Bush has done a few things which perhaps may of note to some..um..liberal minded thinkers.
He is in the process of liberated two countries, Afghanistan and Iraq.
He is in the process of Crushing the Taliban. (You do remember them don’t you?)
He has succeeded in Crippling Al-Qa-eda, or at least wounding them.
He captured Saddam Hussein, (the one with NO WMD’s?) the peace lover who mananged to slaughter over 300,000 of his own people.
He has put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea and hasn’t detonated a single bomb..(yet*)
A meticulous, well-tuned examination of what the Libs say points to the decline of patriotism in our country.
Some of us wish to awaken..and facilitate its restoration.
Some of us have learned to intelligently appreciate life in our free, democratic land, despite its imperfections.
We are keenly aware that the durability and vitality of democracy requires a sense of community, and strong shared values. Without them we witness the social and political fragmentation that abounds.
Lest you despair-
Know this sweet readers….Every citizen is a soldier.
Incite controversy, offer your corrective visions of society, make an impressive case.
At the end of the day, it is you who must take up arms.
See third world county for some brilliant post affecting our patriotism.
Check out brilliance at: TMH’s Bacon Bits
Stop the ACLU has some great updates.
Also linked to some great posts over at:
123 beta, Church and State, The Uncooperative Blogger
It’s the weekend!..Indulge in a little nonsense eh?..
And while your’e at it…how bout ya leave me some trackbacks of your best posts to showcase eh?..Just include a link to this post, trackback and yer done!…heh
“I like nonsense, it wakes up the brain cells. Fantasy is a necessary ingredient in living, it’s a way of looking at life through the wrong end of a telescope. Which is what I do, and that enables you to laugh at life’s realities.”
-Dr. Theodore Geisel, a.k.a. Dr. Seuss
Leave a trackback of your best post for others to read. And for my non-bloggin friends…feel free to mosey around and put your 2 cents in my comments…or jus say hi and wave…Heh.
Just include this permalink in your post and…
use this url for the trackback (right click > copy shortcut).
“One could take billboards for example. Remember the ones that were allegedly signed by ‘God’? More specifically, the sayings appeared on some 10,000 billboards in 200 cities across America. It’s likely your city was included…”
To Believe, or not to Believe; That Is The Question continues..
The billboards were simple and easy to read. White type on a black background that was ‘signed’ by God. No address. No phone number. Not religious or condemning.
Some examples that come to mind include:
What part of ‘Thou shalt not…’ didn’t you understand? …God
That ‘Love thy neighbor thing…’ I meant it. …God
Have you read my #1 best seller? There will be a test. …God
You think it’s hot here? …God
Don’t make me come down there. …God
If you must curse, use your own name! …God
Got me to thinkin…
Suppose you were given the empty billboard…what do you think God would be sayin?
Many of us find it disturbing to hear the sympathetic apologists defend the ACLU’s work to protect pedophiles over our children. We watch the ACLU fight for sex offenders to live next to Elementary schools, and playgrounds. We watched in horror as the ACLU defended NAMBLA, under the banner of free speech, to plan and talk about how to rape young boys. It doubles the anger to hear the apologists defend the ACLU with some twisted talk perverting the Constitution.
In Mississippi, billboards of sex offenders and child molesters are being errected, but of course the ACLU oppose this. Of course all of these things we hear excused away by liberal apologists, but lets take a deeper look at the ACLU’s agenda. Let’s take a deeper look at the industry that the ACLU wants to defend here.
“It would be a mistake to think that all the children who are being exploited sexually are kidnapped by “kid porn” operators. Many of the children are being sold to people by their parents. In some cases, the parents have agreed to perform incest with their children. Gonorrhea of the throat in infants as young as nine and eighteen months has been reported”.source
This is as sick as it gets folks. But the ACLU believes it is a freedom being denied to people. And before liberals start to ask. Yes, the ACLU has a current policy advocating the legalization of child porn distribution and possession.
“Students of liberty, from John Stuart Mill to Thomas Emerson, have all intentionally excluded children from their formula for freedom. The ACLU does not. Not even when the subject is pornography.Quote from Twilight Of Liberty
In 1982, the ACLU, in an amicus role, lost in a unanimous decision in the Supreme Court to legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography.”
The case is…: New York Vs Ferber, 458 U.S. 747
It can be found here.
The ACLU‘s position is this: criminalize the production but legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography. This is the kind of lawyerly distinction that no one on the Supreme Court found convincing. And with good reason: as long as a free market in child pornography exists, there will always be some producers willing to risk prosecution. Beyond this, there is also the matter of how the sale of child pornography relates either to free speech or the ends of good government. But most important, the central issue is whether a free society should legalize transactions that involve the wholesale sexploitation of children for profit.”
The ACLU objects to the idea that porn movie producers be required to maintain records of ages of its performers; this would be ” a gross violation of privacy.”Quotes from Twilight Of Liberty
I don’t think that any other ACLU stance evokes more anger from me, than this one. I mean, how sick can you get? Do these people not have a conscience at all, or are they just plain EVIL? How can one argue this sick, twisted view in the name of “protecting civil liberties?” Please, some liberal out there that loves defending this evil organization…explain this to us. No wonder the ACLU doesn’t want the public to have access to its policy guide!
Since the ACLU thinks that child pornography should be legal, it is not surprising to read that it is against making it a felony to advertise, sell, purchase, barter, exchange, give, or receive child pornography. It is particularly distressed about the prohibition on advertisement, arguing that “the law cannot expect every publisher to decode every advertisment for some hidden and sinister meaning,” as if it took a technician-armed with a special decoding device-to ferret out pictures of children ludely exhibiting their genitals.Quote from Twilight Of Liberty
As legislative counsel for the ACLU in 1985, Barry Lynn told the U.S. Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography (of which Focus on the Family President Dr. James C. Dobson was a member) that child pornography was protected by the First Amendment. While production of child porn could be prevented by law, he argued, its distribution could not be. A few years later (1988), Lynn told the Senate Judiciary Committee that even requiring porn producers to maintain records of their performers’ ages was impermissible.
“If there is no federal record-keeping requirement for the people portrayed in Road and Track or Star Wars,” he said, “there can be no such requirement for Hustler or Debbie Does Dallas.”Quoted Reference
Is the ACLU completely retarded? I would love to think there was some kind of saving grace for an organization that says it is about protecting civil liberties, but with positions like this…which you KNOW are against the will of the people, I don’t know if there is. My head is about to explode just typing this stuff!
Let’s take a deeper look at the industry that the ACLU wants to defend here.
“It would be a mistake to think that all the children who are being exploited sexually are kidnapped by “kid porn” operators. Many of the children are being sold to people by their parents. In some cases, the parents have agreed to perform incest with their children. Gonorrhea of the throat in infants as young as nine and eighteen months has been reported”. source
This is as sick as it gets folks. But the ACLU believes it is a freedom being denied to people. And before liberals start to ask. Yes, the ACLU has a current policy advocating the legalization of child porn distribution and possession. Yes, the ACLU still currently defends pedophile organization’s.
“Mere possession should not be a crime,” said John Roberts, executive director of the Boston branch of the American Civil Liberties Union.”
They are a radically, out of control organization that consistently goes too far, and they must be stopped, before they destroy our Nation. And as for those who support the ACLU, this is the kind of crap your money goes to. As a parent of a 5 year old child, and as a citizen of this great nation, I am outraged! Help us stop this insane organization!
“Here are three questions comparing liberals and conservatives:
1. During the 2004 elections, which car was more likely to be “keyed,” i.e., deliberately scratched — a car with a “John Kerry” bumper sticker in an overwhelmingly conservative area, or a car with a “George W. Bush” sticker in an overwhelmingly liberal area?
2. When speaking at colleges, do right-wing or left-wing speakers need and receive police protection?
3. In a debate between a right-wing and a left-wing speaker before an audience equally divided between left and right, which audience group is more likely to boo and hiss at the speaker with whom it disagrees — the liberal or the conservative?”
Who hates the other more – liberals or conservatives? Dennis Prager continues…….
Here are the answers:
1. Where I live in liberal Los Angeles, drivers of most vehicles with Bush-Cheney bumper stickers have told me (and I have often seen) that their cars (and mine) were deliberately scratched. When I have asked about the fate of cars with Kerry-Edwards stickers in equally conservative areas in, for example, Orange County or even the Bible Belt, no Democrat has reported such intentional damage to his car. This does not mean it never happens, only that it is far more rare. I would bet a lot of money — and I am not a gambler — that cars displaying conservative messages in liberal areas are far more likely to be defaced than cars with liberal messages in conservative areas.
2. When Ann Coulter goes to college campuses, she is accompanied by a bodyguard. And colleges routinely bring in police to protect her and to guard against student violence. No bodyguard or police contingent is necessary for Al Franken. Another leftist, Noam Chomsky, a man who has devoted his life to attacking America, goes from campus to campus without worrying about having so much as a pie thrown at him, something regularly done to conservative David Horowitz.
3. Whenever I have debated representatives of the Left before politically mixed audiences, I have been hissed and booed far more than my opponent was. Others who debate leftists report identical experiences. Why? Because in general, conservative members of the audience are more civil and less angry.
There are a few reasons for this discrepancy. One is that the more left one goes, the more one is likely to encounter people who substitute “social justice” for personal morality. Another is that in the eyes of most leftists, people who oppose their “progressive” views on the environment, the war and taxes are such morally inferior people that they are not owed decent behavior.
But the biggest reason is the most obvious one: Liberals hate conservatives far more than conservatives hate liberals.
As Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic Party, said on national TV, “Our moral values, in contradiction to the Republicans’, is we don’t think kids ought to go to bed hungry at night.” Republicans don’t care about starving children. Liberals deem conservatives to be racist, homophobic, war mongering, money worshipping and sexist. It makes perfect sense to hate such people. I would, too.
The converse is not true. Conservatives tend to view liberals as immature and foolish. But childish adults and fools don’t merit the hatred that racists do. And the liberal charge that conservatives generally label war critics “traitors” is pure fabrication.
Liberals may counter that conservatives hated President Bill Clinton. But that hatred has been more than matched by liberals’ hatred for George W. Bush. And more to the point, Bill Clinton is one individual. Liberals hate virtually all conservatives with the same intensity that many conservatives hated one man named Bill Clinton.”
What is hatred after all if not a “passion”?
Sometimes the intense dislike is concentrated primarily on the qualities of a person, while other times it is directly upon the person himself.
It can become an active propensity to see what is evil and unlovable in others, and can inevitably lead one to feel a fierce satisfaction when the lot of the object of his or her hatred becomes difficult and painful.
The distinction is worth noting.
It is not evil nor inherently wrong to hate what is contrary to the moral law, provided it is not catering to personal spite. Quite to the contrary: detestation of wrongdoing is what produces change and enlightenment.
And while it is normal to feeling indignation or even aversion by the hurt we have suffered at the hands of others, this aversion should not serve as an excuse to “become our enemy” by returning unkindness for unkindness.
There is another kind of kind of enmity, however, which is appallingly special.
This type of Liberals’ words drip with hatred and venom, often expletive laced tirades pass for speech while logical and dispassionate arguments about issues are non-existent.
This is the type of baseless hatred wherein a Liberal would witness time and time again Muzlims destroying property, threatening death and bodily harm to those who speak out against them, funding terrorism throughout the world, and still claim WE are the perpetrators and they, the poor victims of our “imperialism.”
The secret is they thrive on conflict, disharmony, and unrest. It fuels what some may even call human wickedness.
It brings no resolution, no compassion, no understanding..and no Light.
And although there is a time to hate…….Be cautious my dear friends….
The Judeo-Christian tradition maintains that all people have dignity and worth because they are created in the image of God.
Utilize the pain and hatred not for more bloodletting, but perhaps to stanch the wound.
I imagine one of the reasons people cling to their hates so stubbornly is because they sense, once hate is gone, they will be forced to deal with pain.
Hating people is like burning down your own house to get rid of a rat.
-Henry Emerson Fosdick