Moral/Cultural Relativism at a fever pitch in HongKong
Tired of bangin ya head against the concrete wall of moral relativism?
Here we go again.
HONG KONG (Reuters) - More than 800 Hong Kong residents have called on authorities to reclassify the Bible as “indecent” due to its sexual and violent content, following an uproar over a sex column in a university student journal.
Bible drawn into Hong Kong sex publication row
The Web site said the Bible’s sexual content “far exceeds” that of a recent sex column published in the Chinese University’s “Student Press” magazine, which had asked readers whether they’d ever fantasised about in-cest or bes-tiality.
Cue the Lefties for their note-perfect relativism..Sit back with a beer to enjoy the spectacle of quasi-insane PC’ers.
This is a prime example of the end result of moral relativism.
Sure, everyone’s got an equal voice.
Not considering ideology, ability, history, resources, or ..heaven forfend that dirty word.. “morality”
“Equal voice”.
Yea, that’s the kind of warm and fuzzy catch phrase Leftards just eat up innit?
But, back in the ahem..real world,… giving an equal voice to the unethical, immoral and fraudulent serves only to ensure inequality of outcome.
Do ya suppose this will trouble the Leftys?
Think again my sweet friends. Oh, unless ya substitute the word Koooran for the word Bible.
Then they’d go up in flames bout this..quite literally.
What was their reaction to Ham-ass using Mickey Mouse ..the “Hamouse” to indocrinate toddlers with venom and hatred toward Jews and Christians?
We all know one can teach a pre-schooler just about anything, and they will innocently believe it. Sure, You can teach him that Jews are monkeys, and Christians are pigs.
You can teach them to blow themselves up so that they can see mommy in ..ahem..”paradise”
You can even teach him to cut someone’s head off.
What was the leftists’ reaction?
They thought it was “funny”.
Funny.
Zero comprehension for the “wider meaning” of any thing.
Zero.
The same geniuses in the Leftard elite’s commentariat who, despite moral relativism flying in the face of sense and sensibility, still insist that the culture of Shakespeare, the King James Bible, and Keats’s poetry, is no better or worse than some Hong Kong sexploitation survey or Biggies latest rap joint.
“If the Bible is similarly classified as “indecent” by authorities, only those over 18 could buy the holy book and it would need to be sealed in a wrapper with a statutory warning notice.”
Nice that these HongKong twits are capable of comparing superficial similarities, how about some equally worthless superficial differences?
Let’s be honest my friends.
This is bizzare, morally and intellectually dishonest and just downright offensive.
Anti-Christianism and Judaism is the last acceptable prejudice.
Try sayin this bout the Kooooooran eh HongKongiers?
I double dog dare ya.
Dissing the Bible?
Ya betta gitcher selves some “new glue” to hold that society of yours together.
Oh, and by the by, instead of running yer mouths bout the Holy Bible, perhaps you should spend more time Making Sure Women even have Rights
Just my buck and a half.
Sharing with my buds at Blog @ MoreWhat.com, Perri Nelson’s Website, The Random Yak, 123beta, Right Truth, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, Conservative Cat, third world county, stikNstein… has no mercy, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Nuke’s news and views, Planck’s Constant, Dumb Ox Daily News, and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
May 17th, 2007 at 1:51 pm
Don’t forget Christians and conservatives. It’s OK to make fun of these groups as well.
May 17th, 2007 at 2:43 pm
Hey, I think this is a good sign! It means there are some Christians over there shaking the tree these monkeys are hanging around in! OOps, that might be construed as a predjudicial remark — oh, wait, that was another post, sorry.
May 17th, 2007 at 2:52 pm
What a bunch of lefttards! SPIT! And I will not sing Kumbaya! UGH!
May 17th, 2007 at 4:19 pm
“Anti-Christianism and Judaism is the last acceptable prejudice.”
So true . . .
May 17th, 2007 at 5:15 pm
they’ll never get it until they’re hollering for a life jacket and there are no people of faith around to throw them one!
May 17th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
You go girl!! You rock, Angel!
May 17th, 2007 at 7:56 pm
[...] Read more at Angel [...]
May 17th, 2007 at 9:11 pm
Angel….you ring the bell every time…this post is marvelous.
But seriously,
all those cartoon characters, Mickey, Donald,Roadrunner,Rocky & Bullwinkle etc. etc..are unclothed!!!!!
what kind of message does this send to our children????
duh, i guess that it is all right in the proper contents. and the need to get over yourselves is extremely important…so my dear Moe ham &ed dimlights, please, good morning..the coffee is on the table,periodic sniffing of it will be appreciated and if it walks,talks and looks like a farm animal, well you are almost home..till then, may i introduce you to a basic concept, it is call…REALITY.
May 18th, 2007 at 9:33 am
Of our age, the Jewish sages said, “When it comes, let me not be there to see it”. Why? Because it’s an age in which evil (bullying) is rewarded and good (civilized behavior) is punished, on the institutional level. Islam is exempted from the criticism heaped on other religions because the reaction terrifies people. Dhimmitude effectively means, “Jihad pays”. It’s an incentive for terrorism and against reform of Islam toward the “live and let live” mode of other religions.
The righteous today are the brave, those who are not intimidated. HaShem bless all the righteous.
May 18th, 2007 at 10:50 am
Damn, this makes my head hurt.
May 18th, 2007 at 2:27 pm
What DI said! :S
May 18th, 2007 at 11:34 pm
Whaaa? Egads… and Hong Kong of all places… What’s going on in this sad little world of our?!
May 19th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
That’s what happens when a country is allowed to counterfeit the intellectual property of others. They end up thinking the Bible is all about sex. Words like ‘pray’ must have an entirely different meaning in Chinese.
May 19th, 2007 at 11:55 pm
Liberals always pretended (since long before J.S. Mill) that relativism was the only way to insure that “the best” ideas would “rise to the top” so to speak.
What they meant was that THEIR ideas would rise to the top, since Liberals are the most unscrupulous in achieving power.
The best, truest, purest, most holy ideas tend NOT to rise to the top in this world where ignorance, sin and brute force have all too much influence. Maintaining freedom for individuals to find the true, the virtuous, the holy and to pass that on to their children is what a system of constitutional government and rule of law is meant to reign in; while the type of licentious relativism the Liberals hail as god leads straight to anarchy.