Britain: Expel the Traitor Terrorist wanna be’s.

1/3 of UK Muzlims are unemployed.

1/3 are under the age 16.

43% are of Pakistani origin.

25% think MI5 did 7/7.

and 30% don’t even think of themselves as British.
So why does Britain allow them to stay?

Instead of hiding under their burk-as in shame, they’re still “kvetching”.

There is a powerful public perception that men of Asian, Middle Eastern or north African appearance, many of whom will be Mus–lims, are far more likely than white people to be stopped and questioned or searched by police under anti-terror legislation.
Mus-lims feel persecuted but evidence says not

Many people in ethnic minority communities believe this amounts to an unofficial use of racial “profiling”, targeting Mus–lims.

Excuse me.
The Muzlims are the ones being persecuted?
Ah yes, …… 1,000 infidel pardons y’all. bombani-uddy.gif

Time for Britain to implement a mass expulsion mateys.

-To all those who habitually find the slightest fault in democratic Western societies.

-To all those who insist on providing glib, desperate rationalizations for the murderers of 7/7 and 9/11.

-To all those who claim that arrogant American global power and Europe somehow “deserved payback.”

-To all those who deliberately kill civilians, whom the Lib media insist are legitimate combatants with worthy grievances.

Azza matter of fact..expel those alleged journalists as well.
That’s right.
You heard me the first time.

Fighting tyranny is a complicated issue my friends.
In democratic countries …anyone can insult the president of the United States or a leader of a European country and he will not suffer any consequence at all.

Mockery that is insulting is not humor and not all in “good fun”. The kind of mouthing off that would get you punched in a bar can be said on public radio and television with impunity. fireaaani.gif

IzlmoNazi Muzlims see this and use it against us, yet they are playing to a different crowd.

The media brings thunder-and-lightning attention lightningaani.gif to the slightest grievance or “kvetch” from the Muzlims perpetrators who now portray themselves as victims.

boy-scream.gif

First Amendment protection should not be granted to : pornography, vituperation, slander, inflammatory speech inciting to riot or other socially undesirable forms of expression.

Libs have highjacked the meaning of the First Amendment by giving privilege and valuing expression in and of itself independent of any real life consequence that speech may potentially have.

The Leftists are proud of the raging Muzlims, whom they see as First Amendment heros, seen world wide rallying, kvetching, declaring the vilest statements that can be imagined in situations designed specifically to cause harm, murder, (Salamon Rushdie anyone?) embarrassment, and physical and psychological damage to others.

History has shown us repeatedly that certain forms of speech, once they get into circulation, don’t disappear in the light of day.
Quite the contrary: they attract the attention of others and begin to travel and gain steam in a much more effective and powerful way.

In the words of Ann Coulter:

Meanwhile, 100 percent of the successful terrorist attacks on commercial airlines for 20 years have been committed by Ar-abs.

When there is a 100 percent chance, it ceases to be a profile. It’s called a “description of the suspect.”

Time to put an end to Muzlim kvetching once and for all.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled reality.

Sharing my Truth with my friends at Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, Blog @ MoreWhat.com, DeMediacratic Nation, 123beta, Adam’s Blog, Big Dog’s Weblog, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, The Amboy Times, The Bullwinkle Blog, , Conservative Cat, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Faultline USA, third world county, stikNstein… has no mercy, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, Dumb Ox Daily News, Right Voices, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

usaniq.gif

28 Responses to “Britain: Expel the Traitor Terrorist wanna be’s.”

  1. ZionistYoungster says:

    Excellent presentation, Angel.

    Related, on Jihad Watch, the UK’s new security minister says “terror fight could take 15 years”. No, it need not! It could be won within a few months, even weeks, just by giving the Muslim invaders the treatment given to the Sudeten Germans in after World War II. That’s one of the things I wrote about it in my latest, one of the three posts I posted today (yes, batch mode is now fully operational!).

  2. kevin says:

    Europe is going to have to rethink their immigration policies if they want limit terror.

  3. D. Ox says:

    Great post! How is it that calling some odd sexual behavior “sinful” or “perverted” is “hate speech” and criminal, while calling for death to people is “free speech”? The Left long ago gave up on facts and logic to appeal to people’s lowest self-interest to advance its agenda. Keep fighting the good fight… but watch out! Calling for expulsion of a large class of anti-democratic, hateful, irrational, perverted journalists may soon become a crime! Ha, ha.

  4. 123beta says:

    Good Stuff Sunday…

    From time to time I like to share posts from some of my favorite bloggers. A good place to start is with Debbie of Right Truth……

  5. Bar Kochba says:

    The West’s alleged “tolerance” will be its downfall. Read “Age of Tolerance”- I’m not sure of the author but he’s the editor of “The Religion of Peace”. It shows precisely the danger of our multicultural relativism.

  6. Gayle says:

    WOW Angel! Excellent!

    And now the UK has Brown who is forbidding his cabinet to use the term “War on Terrorism”. Brain damage is spreading faster than the plague!

  7. michael says:

    Angel:
    Thanks for pointing out the limits of 1st Amend protections; it’s important for us to remember (as most muslim minorities appear to have forgotten) that with rights come responsibilities.

  8. ZionistYoungster says:

    Just thought… a common objection would be, “But what about those Muslims who aren’t into jihad and sedition?” A tempting answer would be to say they deserve it because they haven’t done enough against their jihadist brethren. While there may be some truth to that, I think it’s a bit unfair, because even non-Muslims are afraid to speak out against the ROP. A better answer, I think, would be, “You’re not helping those innocent Muslims by caving in to the demands of the jihadis. If you want to help them, you can only do that by showing jihad doesn’t pay”.

    Alright, that’s enough for today, gotta get me some sleep.

  9. Old Soldier says:

    I think the solution is quite simple, really. The radical jihadist Muslims want nuclear weapons. I say send a couple their way. Needless to say, I’m about fed up with those who pander to the Devil – lets send the Devil back where he belongs riding on some nuclear fire!

    Great post, by the way!

  10. Kevin says:

    MuslimKvetch. Hey, you’ve got a good idea for a new website!

  11. Defiant_Infidel says:

    Outstanding, Angel. When they use our free speech to publicly spew bile in the direction of our country and people, use it as recorded evidence and deport them based on it.

    I’m also in full support of Cal Thomas’s recently espoused view to stop all Muslim immigration… period. Whether it is all or one of them, that’s the people terrorism 2007 is coming from, therefore we effectively begin by stopping all of them from coming here. We can’t sort this problem out after we’re dead. Modify the policy after the jihad is done perhaps, whenever that might be. It should not be a concern now. This is all out war.

    Let’s say you happen to be a victim of a Muslim suicide bomber and find yourself waking up still alive after the blast. Do you now find comfort in the left’s claimed low odds that that Muslim that was standing beside you would blow himself up, say even if they were supposedly 10,000 to 1? Does that make any victim less wounded or dead? Does it undo the incident?

    “Well, whaddaya know, Jack? Do you realize how remote the chances were of you being near a terrorist attack by a Muslim who actually wishes to do harm to us Americans? Don’t worry, I think you’re gonna’ live!”

    It only takes one. You fight back by first taking steps to absolutely guarantee that you won’t lose. Securing your home soil is elementary.

  12. Jack says:

    It is a hell of a thing.

  13. KKarLLMm says:

    Great work Angel…
    It has long past rational thought on these issues. Think for a moment the absurdity of it all.Why are there muslims in England or the U.S.A to begin with, what are they running away from?? As i see it, there is plenty of real estate available in the Middle East (not Israel…already occupied!!) for the Izmoes to park their donkeys and camels.

    Thought for the day…according to KKarLLMm…

    If the dog can not be trained properly within a reasonable amount of time, it is time to bring him/her back to the shelter. (explantion available upon request).

  14. Freedom Now says:

    I agree that there is a problem here, but disagree with your solution to it.

    Its interesting that Leftists are quick to cite Muslim anger and the need to appease it, yet are ignoring the mounting anger of American Conservatives to the Left’s divisive politics and tacit support for terrorism.

    In any case policies and laws against racial profiling were created for a good cause, but in their application have failed to achieve in any measurable results that wasnt achieved through other means.

    There are already laws on the books making the act of discrimination illegal. Anti-racial profiling measures are there to protect minorities (specifically blacks and latinos) from being harassed by police strictly because of their race.

    However, when a description of a murder suspect describes a black or white male in his forties, then technically it would be racial profiling to authorize police officers to be on the lookout for a suspect of that race.

    Politicians typically posture for votes by pushing for more “robust” legislation that can be more harmful than good.

    Take another example. If a gang of white racists goes fagbashing and seriously attacks homosexuals it wouldnt make sense for police officers to profile elderly black women when searching for the suspects.

    This is common sense. We need laws that recognize the complexity of reality and dont just fit into comfortable leftwing stereotypes.

  15. Angel says:

    THANKS ALLS FOR THE DIVERSE INPUT AND SLANT ON THINGS! :)

  16. DL says:

    The trouble with profiling say the liberals is that it actually aims at the bad guys -and the only bad guys they wish to know are the traditionalist conservative Americans. They have no trouble profiling the rich or the overpaid CEOs or Israel or the Catholic Church or…well you get the idea.

  17. frasypoo says:

    They do need to do something about it and quick.they are so open about their hatred,its horrible.

  18. Panhandle Poet says:

    It seems like most of the terrorist attacks lately have been where the Islamo-coddlers are strongest. I hope it doesn’t take another successful attack against this country to keep us focused on the enemy.

  19. brooke says:

    And make sure you don’t say “Muslim” and “terrorists” in the same sentence, huh, Gordie?

    Looks like Britanistan is here.

  20. Blog @ MoreWhat.com » Blog Archive » MoreWhat Matters: Today’s Blog List says:

    [...] Woman Honor Thyself [...]

  21. The Random Yak says:

    Nicely posted, Angel.

    While I’m at it: tag times two. I got hit with a case of the memes this morning, and they seem to be contagious.

  22. Flanders Fields says:

    Hi Woman,

    Our countries once treated these kinds of speech and action for what they were and still are, sedition, treason, treacherous libel and slander. The parties doing the actions and prohibited speech were spies and traitors. They still are.

    Attempting to classify these acts by foreign interests as mere criminal behaviour is a multiculti attempt to allow a continuation of the same. Sabotage and sabotuers are being allowed free reign in our midst. These deserve to pay the penalty for their crimes – up to and including death.

    Those supporting the continuing import and unchecked, unrestrained presence of these enemies into our societies of the Western world are themselves aiding and assisting spies and sabotuers. They are criminals and they themselves sometimes cross the line of permissible behavior and act as enablers and apologists providing comfort and sustenence to enemies of our people and nations. They also act in support to the enemies by restraining us in our constitutionally protected speech and actions by attempting to reclassify it as “hate speech” or in similar terms and effect, while free speech is FREE SPEECH unrestrained, except for historic exemptions provided for in law.

  23. Joe Gringo says:

    important stats at the start of your post….the birth rate France, Germany, Italy, England are around 1.4 per woman, 2.1 is needed to maintain current population level, the muslims in Europe is around 4.0….not looking bright for EU

  24. Faultline USA says:

    Excellent post! I’m forwarding a link to this article on widely!!! Are we next?

  25. cube says:

    The PC madness will kill us all if we allow it to take over common sense. Unfortunately, common sense isn’t so common.

  26. Incognito says:

    Well… Howard said get out if you don’t want to live under Australia’s laws… the rest of the western world should do the same.

  27. Next Stop Lauderdale says:

    Angel, I want to tell you I linked this post to a question at London Muslim Blog where I have been conducting a dialog with them on a couple of their posts at these locations:

    If this is a problem, please email me. ……….steve

  28. More about the UK plot: UK defends its border procedures « Spanish Pundit says:

    [...] Angel has more about Islam in UK. [...]