Iran Riots: Obama doesn't Want to "Meddle"


Iranian protesters duel in streets,
Obama reluctant to be seen as ‘meddling’; independent media banned

Republicans criticized Obama for not being tougher on Tehran. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said in an interview on NBC’s TODAY show that Obama should speak out about Iran’s “corrupt, flawed sham of an election.”

Nukes? Women tortured in the streets?
Mullacracys and thugs-in chief beheading infidels and hom-osexuals?

It’s okay.. Hussein O is still playin footsie with Iran.


“The amplitude of protests in Iran is proportional to the election fraud.”
-French president Sarkozy

So el Froggo, the French president, appears to have more guts then Hussein O. Could THAT be any more ironic?laugh-ani
He says more in one measley sentence then Hussein O’s entire ahem…(Please don’t dislike us) “statement.”


“But, but, stammer, stammer….We wouldn’t want to meddle.”
How um “Presidential.” Not.

And guess what?
..Moooooosavi will not be a “reformer” nor “pro-Western” guyz n dollz.
Not for nothing but When Lebnon’s Shiiiiii’ite terrorist, militant group Hezzzzzbullah was founded in 1982, the Ayatoljah Khoooomeini included Mooooosavi on the leadership council.


But we wouldn’t wanna put the pedal to the “meddle”, now would we Hussein?


Film starring Hussein Obama in Theatres everywhere:

Sweet ole Iran vs. The Great Satan, a.k.a., the “Meddling” West.”
Co-starring those Evil Zionist Jews, long noses and all.


We are not amused.


Sharing with Rosemary’s Thoughts, Nuke Gingrich , third world county, , Right Truth, The World According to Carl, and DragonLady’s World , thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.


18 Responses to “Iran Riots: Obama doesn't Want to "Meddle"”

  1. heidianne jackson says:

    simply amazing that the frenchman has more backbone than the american. oh, my bad, obama is NOT an american. we are indeed not amused.

  2. RightKlik says:

    Obama: a tyrant, and a friend of the same.

  3. elvis says:

    Obama is voting present again!

  4. maria says:

    his sheepishness is pretty friggin scary. i like your snark, angel.

  5. Debbie says:

    Obama doesn’t mind meddling in Israel’s business.

  6. Ogre says:

    Just about every president before Obama didn’t consider supporting freedom around the world as “meddling.” In fact, most US presidents considered the United States as a bastion of freedom and a place where freedom-lovers from around the world could go for help if they needed help. It was a place where dictators feared to annoy, because freedom-supporters in their country would be helped by America.

    But those times are now clearly gone. Obama has made his, and America’s, position clear on the world’s stage: WE WILL NOT SUPPORT FREEDOM anywhere, at any time. If you want freedom on planet earth, you’re on your own because America will not “meddle” in your country and help you.

  7. nancz says:

    perhaps he can send dhimmi carter over to smooth things over – this IS his mess!

  8. Pasadena Closet Conservative says:

    Instead of a van in the cartoon at the top, it should have been one of those tiny little Obamobiles!

  9. MK says:

    Hussein is too busy polishing their ass and telling us all that islam is the same as christianity, it’s all good people, islam=peace, give jihad a chance and all that crap. What a waste of skin & space!

  10. North Northwester says:

    Great post, Angel, and I suppose the freedom types the world over are thinking much the same thing.

    Personally, I love 0′s bipartisanship, don’t you?

    Despite the Guardian Council’s Henry Ford attitude to selecting candidates – not something the mainstream media are clueful about, as in :
    “So Ted, why do yo think millions are risking their lives to up hold the election of one particular crazed Islamist rather than another? Is it his stance on late-term abortions for rape victims, wherein he says he’d increase the minimum age for stoning the little trollops to the twenty-first trimester, or is it something else?” – so many people are risking their lives as we fortunate ones post in safety, and I don’t think they’re doing so to uphold the tenets and constitution of the Islamic Revolution, somehow.

    And I for one an grateful as a European for past American interference and so much American blood, so that I can publish this comment and do it in English instead of German or Russian, without looking over my shoulder for the police

    What have you done, America?

  11. DaBlade says:

    France, home of the free? Now that I think about it, why would Obama support the pro-democracy movement in Iran when he doesn’t support it in the U.S.?

  12. joe says:

    My question is this, Should Americans be ashamed of Americans when Iranians stand up for their votes to count and we didn’t????? I think we should hang our heads in shame. The world looks to us and emulates us—as we used to be. We have abandoned them, and ourselves by even allowing that asshole to take office. WHERE WAS HE BORN? HOW MANY CROOKED VOTES DID HE GET? WHERE DID HIS $600,000,000 CAMPAIGN MONEY REALLY COME FROM???


  13. Brooke says:

    Obama is Carter x1,000.


  14. Jack says:

    Iran- One dictator is pretty much the same as the other.

  15. Khaki Elephant says:

    Well, at least Obama has found time to meddle with the American auto industry

  16. Always On Watch says:

    BHO doesn’t care about freedom and democracy. All he cares about is his OWN power.

    As Debbie pointed out above, he has no problem with meddling with Israel’s policies and politics. Heh.

  17. Michael says:

    I think most of your commenters have covered pretty well on the mark.

    But to believe that one can get despots and dictators to change their ways using fancy words is as foolish as one believing they can turn lead into gold.

  18. EDGE says:

    Israel better get ready to take on these (and every other) a$$hole over there! :(